Kavanagh should be disqualified cause he is not man enough to admit that as a kid in 80s he made some mistakes (some of horrible) which unfortunately were common. .
Mistakes such as what?
Having too many beers and laughing at flatulence jokes?
Kavanagh should be disqualified cause he is not man enough to admit that as a kid in 80s he made some mistakes (some of horrible) which unfortunately were common. .
So what? How is that relevant to the question of whether Kavanaugh should be disqualified based on a accusation of groping and some assertions by other women which are unsubstantiated and seemingly false.
If there is real evidence Kavanaugh was going around molesting women he should not be on the Court. But, I have not seen sufficient evidence.
But, if you were accused of a crime would you think you have received Due Process under out Constitution if the victim can not present a date, or time and the "witnesses" she names state they remember no such event.
2. Doesn't every American deserve due process? Before they lose jobs and their lives?
For instance the New York Times looked to corroborate Swetnick's story or one of the "victims" stories. They could not find corroboration so they did not publish.
Using that NY Times standard Congress should not have published if they could not corroborate Ford's story.
Using Congressional standards any male and maybe some women in the US can now be destroyed.
You can still love women and respect them and realize that many women are molested and at the same time realize there needs to be some corroboration before accusations should be made public.
Kavanagh should be disqualified cause he is not man enough to admit that as a kid in 80s he made some mistakes (some of horrible) which unfortunately were common. Instead, he lied and technically perjured himself. Regarding the due process, he will get his when he will be charged with crimes and I'm confident he can defend himself. he did a job interview and he failed at it miserably.
just look at his yearbook.
Exactly. It is disgustingly dishonest to stand there under oath and pretend he had no influence over what some editor put into the yearbook. Disgusting and a lie. The side if him of the many times he was in a drunken stupor were completely omitted by him and the question by the sex crime prosecutor whether he ever remembered a time he woke up the next morning and could not remember anything or part of the previous night is an oxymoron. The yearbook, hundreds of classmates in his school and other schools corroborate that he and his kind drank themselves into oblivion many times. Nothing wrong with that (well illegal as under drinking age but forgivable) but claiming he never forgot a thing about the previous night goes straight against all scientific and medical evidence. I am absolutely sure not a single guy on this entire forum could claim the same. Everyone drank before to a degree that they forgot pieces of the previous night. That is where he lost my trust in him. Perhaps he studied hard was a good athlete and good church boy. But there is the other side of him that partied hard and certainly there were times he drank so hard that he must have forgotten details of the previous night.
You sound like you may need to be hospitalized if Kavanaugh is confirmed.
Just remember that we are here for you.
Absolutely, due process that's why we finally have an FBI investigation on this particular accusation. By the way he was not accused of groping. He is accused of attempted RAPE for which there is no statute of limitation. Whatever the FBI investigation finds shall serve as deciding factor whether he will be excluded from consideration as Supreme Court Judge or confirmed. Simple as that. We have that now thanks to Jeff Flake. Thank you Senator Flake.
Really, accused of attempted rape on those facts? No or extremely low chance of that based on the facts Ms. Ford presented. .
Nothing that Ford stated went any where close to showing that the man who was groping her met the the elements of attempted rape....
https://rape.uslegal.com/attempt-to-rape/
I realize that definitions will vary by state.
But generally you must establish there was an intention to rape in the Man's mind and that he touched her genitals after removing her clothes.
Did she testify to anything like that at all.
All she stated was that she had fear it might happen.