Kavanaugh hearing...

How about a couple of examples?


They have not been released yet.

Don't forget that Piezoe has that SuperDuper Batman Decoder Ring that lets him see secret parts of the Constitution that no one else has seen.

That may work for Kavanaugh's papers too, also known as George Bush's correspondence that had to pass through Kavanaugh to reach the president.
 
I see. And all of his opinions are a matter of public record.

Yet, the dems still want hundreds of thousands of records to review before deciding on how to vote on the candidate that they have said they will not vote for.

Nice.
Many, if not nearly all of Kavanaugh's most absurd, and "endearing" opinions, a la manière de Rudy Giuliani, are most likely to have come while working in his ultra sycophantic role as a former White House step-and-fetch-it. These are the very records most interesting to the public; yet these are among the records being withheld! This is one of the several reasons for the fuss. And now we have a President, an un-indicted co-conspirator if you will, whose staff has deemed it necessary to withhold records on the shaky basis of "executive privilege" of the one under investigation, but a privilege being asserted over records of yet another Occupant of the White House altogether. A most amazing circumstance, wouldn't you say? Very interesting don't you think?
 
Last edited:
Many, if not nearly all his most absurd opinions, a la manière de Rudy Giuliani, have come while working in his ultra sycophantic role as a former White House step-and-fetch-it. These are the very records most interesting to the public; yet these are among the records being withheld! This is one of the several reasons for the fuss. And now we have a President, an un-indicted co-conspirator if you will, whose staff has deemed it necessary to withhold records on the shaky basis of "executive privilege" of the one under investigation, but a privilege being asserted over records of yet another Occupant of the White House altogether. A most amazing circumstance, wouldn't you say? Very interesting don't you think?


I see. So those "crazy writings and opinions" that you referred to are not available to the public. Only available to you through speculation and via your Batman Decoder Ring as discussed.
 
I see. And all of his opinions are a matter of public record.

Yet, the dems still want hundreds of thousands of records to review before deciding on how to vote on the candidate that they have said they will not vote for.

Nice.
Yes - his 3rd grade homework and the love notes he sent to his first girlfriend are also on that list.
What? He didn’t save them? That’s grounds for disqualification....said the Insane Libtards.
 
I see. So those "crazy writings and opinions" that you referred to are not available to the public. Only available to you through speculation and via your Batman Decoder Ring as discussed.
You're such an eager correspondent that you rattled off a rejoinder before I had a chance to correct my injudicious word choice. Please read my post as it now stands, not as it stood. You should know however that the most observant of us do have some knowledge of what is contained in the withheld documents from other sources, viz., a U.S. Senator.
 
How about a couple of examples?
I can not recommend too highly watching reruns of yesterdays marathon hearing. Why should I have tortured myself so just for the accolades you'll bestow on me were I to bend to your request. There is also available to you Kvanaugh's paper in the Minnesota Law Review, where he strikes a different, but not surprising for him at least, tone then he did while toiling away for Mr. Starr. Oh, and should I mention the nice article in Politico on this very topic.
 
You're such an eager correspondent that you rattled off a rejoinder before I had a chance to correct my injudicious word choice. Please read my post as it now stands, not as it stood. You should know however that the most observant of us do have some knowledge of what is contained in the withheld documents from other sources, viz., a U.S. Senator.


Just go ahead and post the writings and opinions you referred to as "crazy" and we will take it from there. Dont know what said and re-said above. Or are you still waiting for secret batman decoder material. He has been on the bench for 13 years. Quite a record of publicly available material as it applies to actual legal matters rather than all the side witchhunting from when he worked in the white house.
 
Just go ahead and post the writings and opinions you referred to as "crazy" and we will take it from there. Dont know what said and re-said above. Or are you still waiting for secret batman decoder material. He has been on the bench for 13 years. Quite a record of publicly available material as it applies to actual legal matters rather than all the side witchhunting from when he worked in the white house.
And the majority of his opinions are right in line with his colleagues on the Appeals court bench. Nothing to see here. He is a team player. Its his vision of the Imperial Presidency developed for expediency during his time in the Bush White House, when The U.S. practice of drowning its detainees became an indelicate issue, and his "textualism," expeditiously trotted out to explain why nothing could be done about the AR15, that's truly alarming. It is in these lapses into pure suck-up-edness, as though morals never existed and lustitia was never blind, where crazy is much too mild a word. But as I noted, his record demonstrates he can be a fine sycophant when it suits his purpose; please, Lustitia, go fuck yourself!

Right now his purpose is to get himself on the Supreme Court. Mr. trump adores the obsequious. So why not be obsequious. Turns out, that was easy. He's well practiced at sucking up. Then the only task remaining was to somehow get added to the list. I worked! Next stop SCOTUS and the Chubbaly winsome Mr. Kavanaugh finds himself all in black seated at stage right.
 
Back
Top