Kavanaugh accuser goes public

Always.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fb446ef769a6

Liz Swisher, who described herself as a friend of Kavanaugh in college, said she was shocked that — in an interview focused largely on his high school years and allegations of sexual misconduct — he strongly denied drinking to the point of blacking out.

“Brett was a sloppy drunk, and I know because I drank with him. I watched him drink more than a lot of people. He’d end up slurring his words, stumbling,” said Swisher, a Democrat and chief of the gynecologic oncology division at the University of Washington School of Medicine. “There’s no medical way I can say that he was blacked out. . . . But it’s not credible for him to say that he has had no memory lapses in the nights that he drank to excess.”

Lynne Brookes, who like Swisher was a college roommate of one of the two women now accusing Kavanaugh of misconduct, said the nominee’s comments on Fox did not match the classmate she remembered.

“He’s trying to paint himself as some kind of choir boy,” said Brookes, a Republican and former pharmaceutical executive who recalled an encounter with a drunken Kavanaugh at a fraternity event. “You can’t lie your way onto the Supreme Court, and with that statement out, he’s gone too far. It’s about the integrity of that institution.”
BRAVO! BRAVISIMO!
And three Cheers for Swisher!
 
Can she explain why two years after she graduated high school -- she was partying with underage teenagers during "beach week" and kept going back to parties 10 or more times after she witnessed sexual assaults at the parties.

Hint: She's lying.
All while basically admitting she was a slut in school. Another "credible" witness.
 
Can she explain why two years after she graduated high school -- she was partying with underage teenagers during "beach week" and kept going back to parties 10 or more times after she witnessed sexual assaults at the parties.

Hint: She's lying.

I myself attended parties while in high school where college students were present. Shockingly this still happened into the '00s
 
Can she explain why two years after she graduated high school -- she was partying with underage teenagers during "beach week" and kept going back to parties 10 or more times after she witnessed sexual assaults at the parties.

Hint: She's lying.
You may have confused two different things here. It is of only passing interest whether Switzer liked the parties -- she apparently liked them. But it is of great relevance to the Kavanaugh investigation what went on at those parties and who the usual attendees were if they included Kavanaugh and his buddies. (You're disappointing me. Nothing wrong with being a Republican or a Democrat, but if you must be one or the other, please be a smart one. )
 
Last edited:
All while basically admitting she was a slut in school. Another "credible" witness.
I would think her being a "slut", if she is, I have no idea, would make her rather an expert on these particular parties. Do to her expertise and experience, she was obviously no one-time casual observer, I would rate here impression of the parties as highly reliable. I'm disappointed in you too.
 
You're right, this pathetic cuck should be wearing panties and a dress. He has plenty of company to dress up with him.
What a bunch of gutless wonders these "men" have become. No evidence, no witnesses, zero credibility, but we must listen just because a woman said so. No, that is a horrible and dangerous precedent to set. Now any goofy broad with an ax to grind can destroy a mans life. Forget the politics, this opens the door even wider than it already is for baseless and frivolous charges to be brought against any man in any profession. It's nonsense.
flake-waving-gif.652324
 
I myself attended parties while in high school where college students were present. Shockingly this still happened into the '00s



Did you continue to attend parties where serial raping was occurring because one was not enough, as one of Kavanaugh's accusers said she did?

She sounds like a peach, and some of dems want the FBI to be able to investigate her. I might be in favor of that too. Except they want it to drag out the process. I am saying if that is how you want to use your week that Trump has given you, go for it, but no extension. Bring her in before the committee next week too. I am up for that.
 
Back
Top