Kavanaugh accuser goes public

How does that even come out of someone's mind?

"No reasonable Conservative approves of sending death threats to Kavanaugh's accuser.

However it appears that many on the left wholeheartedly approve of sending death threats to Kavanaugh."

There is just no sense to this lad at all. His mind is in complete gibberish mode.

I've pointed out before, GWB is a perfect example of too stupid to know he is. It is only that the US is overflowing with wealth do guys like him have jobs that pay good money. Here someone with his intellect would be helping people reverse into spaces in the supermarket car park.
 
Slartibartfast said:
How does that even come out of someone's mind?

"No reasonable Conservative approves of sending death threats to Kavanaugh's accuser.

However it appears that many on the left wholeheartedly approve of sending death threats to Kavanaugh."

There is just no sense to this lad at all. His mind is in complete gibberish mode.

I've pointed out before, GWB is a perfect example of too stupid to know he is. It is only that the US is overflowing with wealth do guys like him have jobs that pay good money. Here someone with his intellect would be helping people reverse into spaces in the supermarket car park.
More...

Reverting to your typical liberal playbook and insult others when you cannot refute the information. You even ignore the link to the article about the threats to Kavanaugh and his family.

Quite obviously by refusing to decry the threats to Kavanaugh and his family- it means you support them.

Let me be very clear -- threats to Brett Kavanaugh and his family, or to Christine Ford and her family are wrong. Those making the threats should be prosecuted.
 
Frederick Foresight said:
A hearing is not a court of law. It is only in a court of law, as I understand it, that the polygraph is inadmissible. So the idea is interesting from a practical standpoint.
More...

Sure, let's use the nomination of a supreme court justice to experiment to see if methods that are too unreliable to be used in court are still good enough to destroy a man. And if he "passes" you can then conclude that that a polygraph test is unreliable. We know in advance how the kabuki dance works.

How bout she shows up and says what she must and Kavanaugh addresses it. Then we schedule a vote?
 
Frederick Foresight said:
It's interesting that Kavanaugh dismissed out of hand even being at such a party when another person remembers having heard about the incident at the time.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/su...ls-hearing-alleged-kavanaugh-incident-n911111

giphy.gif
More...


I think I remember it too.
 
I can remember times in the past we had a couple of liberal spammers on the boards, usually active just before elections but lately we've been infiltrated. It's obvious there's a concerted nefarious effort to stifle and ridicule any conservative thought or speech.
 
gwb-trading said:
Reverting to your typical liberal playbook and insult others when you cannot refute the information. You even ignore the link to the article about the threats to Kavanaugh and his family.

Quite obviously by refusing to decry the threats to Kavanaugh and his family- it means you support them.

Let me be very clear -- threats to Brett Kavanaugh and his family, or to Christine Ford and her family are wrong. Those making the threats should be prosecuted.
More...

You post bollocks reviews about her and are slapped down. You post a bollocks article Booker wrote as what? Nothing just you read it is something bad and thus repeat it. You post bollocks about her not being able to identify the year of the accused event.

I was the one who made the case that the threats against her were morally wrong, now you are spraying your shit in the air like bad grandpa about I support attacks against him.

Again, YOU ARE LOW IQ. You just get away with it because you live in the pigs trough and are fortunate to have stronger people in your life to save your arse.

Show us some trading some day. Even sim. You can't. It is too hard for you to do.
 
Last edited:
RedDuke said:
Similar to Trump tape being just locker room talk, got it. Comparing being part "No means Yes and Yes means anal." club to telling a sex joke, com on are you really this dumb or GOP candidate above else even decency?
More...
And if you're equating frat boy slogans and locker room humor to actual sexual assault then you have either lived a very sheltered life, or have succumb to radical left ideology.
 
Here4money said:
The accuser is highly regarded at her job, has impeccable integrity, and has no known patterns of making up accusations as is being alleged. The accused is an unbalanced corporate con, represented by law skirting interests who is working in collusion with other radical shills, all of them financed by corporate lobbyists.Gee, who to believe?
More...

Yeh sure. Impeccable integrity.

Accuses a man of impeccable integrity of attempted rape. Then is unwilling to testify unless the FBI can develop some details for her, because she can't remember.

The bitch should be subpoened to testify on the Senate's terms with reasonable accommodations for her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top