Kavanaugh accuser goes public

RedDuke · Sep 19, 2018

TreeFrogTrader said:
Yeh right. And she suddenly wanted that level playing field after Kavanaugh did too well at the hearings and the dems started looking at what else they had in their bag of tricks to delay the confirmation.

Plan A was to delay the confirmation until all of George Bush's records were released. When that failed they began asking "what else we got." Then Feinstein said that she had some broad who she had not really looked into who wants to go dirty and maybe we can get something going with that. So we went from having her up on the shelf, to suddenly now we need a full FBI investigation.

A shot from the grassy knoll.

I would give her more attention than she wants.

But you have to agree all done masterfully. If is a win/win for Dems, hope you realize it.

TreeFrogTrader · Sep 19, 2018

RedDuke said:
But you have to agree all done masterfully. If is a win/win for Dems, hope you realize it.

Yeh sure, and you probably have your post already to go that says that if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems too.

Whatever gets you through the day.

And no, having some loon spout off and say she was almost killed by a supreme court nominee is not the most masterful game in town. We are not talking MENSA material. This is just a basic drive-by shooting.

CaptainObvious · Sep 19, 2018

We do need an FBI investigation, on Ford. Why did she scrub her social media accounts? What are her political and business associations? Has she been coached for her testimony? What is her mental heath history? Any arrest records? Any records of violent outbursts, verbal or physical? We need to know more about this woman before we can take her accusations seriously.
We also need a congressional committee to look into why Fienstien held on to this information for so long. Was there collusion among democrats and the Washington post to hold this story? We need to know.

Cuddles · Sep 19, 2018

CaptainObvious said:
We do need an FBI investigation, on Ford. Why did she scrub her social media accounts? What are her political and business associations? Has she been coached for her testimony? What is her mental heath history? Any arrest records? Any records of violent outbursts, verbal or physical? We need to know more about this woman before we can take her accusations seriously.
We also need a congressional committee to look into why Fienstien held on to this information for so long. Was there collusion among democrats and the Washington post to hold this story? We need to know.

None of what you list is illegal

RedDuke · Sep 19, 2018

TreeFrogTrader said:
Yeh sure, and you probably have your post already to go that says that if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems too.

Whatever gets you through the day.

And no, having some loon spout off and say she was almost killed by a supreme court nominee is not the most masterful game in town. We are not talking MENSA material. This is just a basic drive-by shooting.

When you do not understand do not rush to conclusions. Where did I say "if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems"??? I meant that Ford situation/ploy is a win/win. If she testifies, there is a chance he won't be confirmed. If she does not under pretense that FBI did not investigate, the base will be fired up even more.

I guess it is too complicated for you.

CaptainObvious · Sep 19, 2018

Here4money said:
None of what you list is illegal

Presumption of guilt based on a empty accusation for him is okay, but you have no problem with that. If the woman has a serious mental heath history, a past filled with radical left activism, has made empty claims before, all that goes to her credibility. And since collusion is the topic of the day, all day, every day, we need to know when the left is doing it.

TreeFrogTrader · Sep 19, 2018

Here4money said:
None of what you list is illegal

Issues that go to the credibility and motives of a witness- the loon accuser and feinstein for example- are relevant and properly subject to examination. Whether any of those factors are criminal is a separate matter which may or may not be relevant.

TreeFrogTrader · Sep 19, 2018

RedDuke said:
When you do not understand do not rush to conclusions. Where did I say "if Kavanaugh is confirmed that is a win for the dems"??? I meant that Ford situation/ploy is a win/win. If she testifies, there is a chance he won't be confirmed. If she does not under pretense that FBI did not investigate, the base will be fired up even more.

I guess it is too complicated for you.

okay. I just read things on a hit and run basis at this time of the day so I am dependent on the poster making immediate sense rather than requiring me to consult my ouiji board to find out what is actually meant.

Cuddles · Sep 19, 2018

CaptainObvious said:
Presumption of guilt based on a empty accusation for him is okay, but you have no problem with that. If the woman has a serious mental heath history, a past filled with radical left activism, has made empty claims before, all that goes to her credibility. And since collusion is the topic of the day, all day, every day, we need to know when the left is doing it.

And that credibility should be questioned by the pertinent authorities, not Breitbarters looking for a hit job by skimming thorough her social media history.

gwb-trading · Sep 19, 2018

Here4money said:
And that credibility should be questioned by the pertinent authorities, not Breitbarters looking for a hit job by skimming thorough her social media history.

She can show up Monday to be questioned by the Senate panel.... or she can shut her trap.

EDIT: Please note that I edited this post. Earlier the first part was a re-post of something I posted earlier. I removed this part.