Kamala Harris Wants Your Guns

[Frederick Foresight]

I don't judge how smart they are by how they look. Try it sometime.

I'm judging them by their conduct in the photos, and I'm not impressed. Would you really like to see any of your family members posing with guns like that? Frankly, I'd be embarrassed. And that was the basis of my comment.

 

[DTB2]

I know, you find this much more impressive. Not me.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I know, you find this much more impressive. Not me.

You know as well as I do that the Right has taken that remark so out of context as to be unrecognizable. Make your arguments, but keep them real.

 

[Scataphagos]

The opportunistic Sen. Harris wasted little time delivering a scalding anti-Second Amendment screed in a "town hall", ie carefully scripted, press event. The media hopped to and began to describe in even more glowing terms.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...d-room-with-autopsy-photographs-those-babies/

To Harris, the issue basically boils down to if you like seeing pictures of dead school children. Ironically, she refuses to apply that standard to immigration issues, having her staffers summarily eject Angel Moms from her office. It's wide open only to dreamers or anyone not actually from the United States apparently.

She brushes away Constitutional issues as a "false choice." This is straight from the Obama School of Constitutional interpretation, ie I am not letting some old piece of paper written by dead white guys limit me. Particularly not when the federal courts are filled with traitors who will rubberstamp anything I want. She thinks semi-autos should be banned. She's still mulling over single shots.

Another Lefty/Progressive/Commie/DemoCrap... with her "screw the Constitution" agenda.

 

[DTB2]

You know as well as I do that the Right has taken that remark so out of context as to be unrecognizable. Make your arguments, but keep them real.

I remember it live, with all its context intact.

 

[Frederick Foresight]

I remember it live, with all its context intact.

Good. As do I. Then you know.

 

[DTB2]

Good. As do I. Then you know.

Here's your context and deals with honesty and not obfuscating.

Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?

 

[Frederick Foresight]

Here's your context and deals with honesty and not obfuscating.

Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that -- an assault sprang out of that -- and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make?

Come on. You're better than this. So "context" is truncating her response mid-stream? Really?

Please try again:

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-...t-hillary-clintons-what-difference-does-it-m/

Kindly read the exchange leading up to the parsed comment some of you guys like to quote, and then please be sure to read that comment in its entirety.

 

[Tony Stark]

Ha! A blanket statement bigger than Kamala's mattress.

Nice job.

Or Trumps STD infested urine soaked mattress.

 

[DTB2]

Her original response is the meat of the paragraph and shows her disdain for the American people, the rest is just political BS talk.

It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.

Johnson: OK. Thank you, Madame Secretary.

•