I don't think so. I've played around with many types of filters over the years...Kalman, Butterworth, low-pass, and various IIR and FIR filters. My opinion is that none of them have an advantage. You're better off sticking with indicators that other people follow such as the 50, 100, and 200 SMA. Indicators are not magic. Although they are easy to curve-fit, the only predictive power that they have comes from other people using them and thinking the same thing. Do you really think that there's anything magic about Fibonacci numbers? They only work because enough people follow them and expect them to work. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy.