AAA:
>These people were minding their own
>business, harming no one.
I think they've f**k*d this one up from a legal standpoint if they can't even fine the "informant", BUT ...
Let's suppose there truly are 16yo girls there with as many as 4 kids. Let's suppose the DNA results show they are fathered by the older members.
Do you still say "harming no one"?
JB
>These people were minding their own
>business, harming no one.
I think they've f**k*d this one up from a legal standpoint if they can't even fine the "informant", BUT ...
Let's suppose there truly are 16yo girls there with as many as 4 kids. Let's suppose the DNA results show they are fathered by the older members.
Do you still say "harming no one"?
JB
