Just the President of the United States saluting a North Korean general.

Good1 said:
Again, I have not compared Canadian and Brits to cucks and pimps. But a second generation Muslim, born in Canada, and who feels more at home in the UK might see things that way.
More...

For someone peddling conspiracy theories about foreigners, your grasp on conversational English and analogy is rather poor. Try a new phone.
 
Last edited:
Slartibartfast said:
:) haha. I really don't care about your ignorance but I know better than to get into that level of hair splitting.

The Continental army was founded in 1775. The US Army may draw it's roots to this but except for a few fragments for special purposes it was disbanded.. I was discussing the 2nd in the context of the mind of people at the time.

When Joy Division's singer died and they became New Order. I don't bother stating the now perfectly obvious. So.. this leads to Federalist 29? the out-of-sequence document the 2nd can trace it's origin to? And was the US army founded in name when?... My mistake was was inelegantly trying to explain something (not very) complicated to a dumb Russian.

You will notice nobody else educated has taken up your angle because unlike you, they grasp the larger picture.

Edited: Just a little googling because I recalled it had another intermediary state:

"Legion of the United States, which was established in 1791 and renamed the United States Army in 1796."

Why change the name if there were not also changes in the perception of the purpose of the army. Have a think and get back with more hair splitting.
More...


The U.S. Army was founded on June 14, 1775 and had eleven branches by late 1776. It always has and always will consider that as its birthday. Your pathetic Wikipedia obfuscations only show you don't know shit and can't admit when you're wrong -- the hallmarks of a spoiled, petulant child (liberal).

What you refer to isn't even significant enough to be noted by the U.S. Army Center of Military History in their chronology of the Army's beginnings. https://history.army.mil/html/faq/branches.html

So please set the Army straight and be sure to mention you're the paper trading blowhard from Colombia when you call. :D

Army - Copy.png
 
exGOPer said:
For some peddling conspiracy theories about foreigners, your grasp on conversational English and analogy is rather poor. Try a new phone.
More...

You said that me calling you a Canadian or Brit is like you calling me a cuck, a pimp, and my mom a prostitute.

As a Muslim living in the UK, that's how you might see the situation, but that's not how I see it.

The way you speak, in conversation, reveals more than you are willing to admit.
 
Poindexter said:
Wikipedia? :D

The U.S. Army was founded on June 14, 1775 and had eleven branches by late 1776. It always has and always will consider that as it's birthday. Your pathetic Wikipedia semantics only show you don't know shit and can't admit when you're wrong -- the hallmarks of a spoiled, petulant child (liberal).

What you refer to isn't even significant enough to be noted by the U.S. Army Center of Military History in their chronology of the Army's beginnings. https://history.army.mil/html/faq/branches.html

Tell it to the Army and be sure to mention you're the paper trading blowhard from Colombia when you call.

View attachment 187308
More...

Nice try Russian but no cigar.

Now you understand why I never bothered addressing your one-time-you-think-you-were-so-right before. Because I was laughing at your less than even high-school grasp of things :) :)

I guess that is all you learned mopping seals and dusting in your job.You do know that pilfering stationery is a naughty?

So was it your dad was first generation or were you naturalised?
 
Good1 said:
You said that me calling you a Canadian or Brit is like you calling me a cuck, a pimp, and my mom a prostitute.
.
More...

As I said, get a better phone, read up on how analogies work and then we can continue this thread. With your complete lack of grasp on how English works, there is no point to the back and forth.
 
exGOPer said:
As I said, get a better phone, read up on how analogies work and then we can continue this thread. With your complete lack of grasp on how English works, there is no point to the back and forth.
More...

Explain the analogy then. Show how you have not made that comparison.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top