Just the President of the United States saluting a North Korean general.

First, it's ad hominEm

Interesting. The auto speller on my phone automatically turns ad hominEM into ad hominum.

So I'll note your objection as ad hominum in itself, and/or more evidence of your dripping pernicious British supremacy. Or rather, your Islamic sense of supremacy currently aided by legacy latent British supremacy.
 
Sounds like insincere garbage to me. Opening and closing with ad hominum arguments makes a garbage sandwich when you consider the actual contents of the argument. Where is the beef?

What did Trump do throughout his career and then famously in the campaign?

AD HOMINEM (you still can't spell it) attacks.

Garbage1.

Think about it, you will get there.

images
 
Quote me where I have said that or admit you are a pathological liar just like the guy you worship.

You have said it. A search will confirm that, unless you have used the time given to edit posts to delete it.
 
Oh look... the paper trading blowhard from Colombia thinks he's an expert on U.S. military customs and courtesies because he had two challenge coins left to him. :D

Trump didn't salute the North Korean general you idiot, he returned the North Korean general's salute. Since Trump was on a diplomatic trip, to have not done so would have been a major insult, on par with rejecting a handshake. Also, when you're on a diplomatic mission you don't insult people just because it might be used as propaganda. Obama's bows were far more damaging to our country.

Stick to what you know -- paper trading.

View attachment 187305

View attachment 187306

You know what is in my grandaunt's house in the US, a print of this. :) Just came to mind.

Wash-prayer.jpg


So both knees to the flag but just one to God? Puts some things in perspective.

That is Washington BTW.

It would not have been an insult, you don't know how anything works Russian. It was a great and unexpected propaganda coup for NK.
 
If I didn't, it's because I underestimated your perniciousness.

So let me get this straight.

You make baseless allegations in multitude of threads, then you see me admitting that you were right about those allegations but you conveniently ignore that confession post and then claim without any basis that I edited it.

So if I make a claim that I fucked your wife and you watched it being the perennial cuck you are which you admitted on these very boards but later edited them out of perniciousness, my post would have exactly the same validity right? I can now call you a cucked wife pimp because that's the standard of evidence we are agreeing to?
 
Back
Top