Just Stats

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Trader666:

Money productive people haven't earned yet isn't their kids' money or the government's. You're delusional.

Any increases in revenue should come only from growth in the economy, not parasitic tax increases. The debt that politicians racked up needs to be paid off by that and cutting spending (especially to parasites). Speaking of which, are you already a parasite or do you just wish you were one?

Great, so cut spending. If that's possible, like you claim, then it should be no problem to do it the responsible way and cut spending first.

If you say it isn't possible, and you still want tax cuts, then it gives the lie to your statement that you're a fiscal conservative.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Yannis:

Read this and weep folks
From an ER doctor

"I live and work in a border state overrun with illegals; they make more money having kids than we earn working fulltime; today I had a 25 year old with 8 kids that’s right 8; all illegal anchor babies and she had the nicest nails;cell phone;hand bag; clothing etc; she makes about 1500 monthly for each; do the math. I used to say “we are the dumbest nation on earth” now I must say and sadly admit: YOU are the dumbest people on earth (that includes me) for we elected the idiot idealogues who have passed the bills that allow this; sorry; we need a revolution; Vote em all out in 2010.

If the immigrant is over 65, they can apply for SSI and Medicaid and get more than a woman on Social Security, who worked from 1944 until 2004. She is only getting $791 per month because she was born in 1924 and there's a 'catch 22.'
It is interesting that the federal government provides a single refugee with a monthly allowance of $1,890. Each can also obtain an additional $580 in social assistance, for a total of $2,470 a month.
This compares to many single pensioners, who after contributing to the growth and development of America for 40 to 50 years, receive a monthly maximum of $1,012 in old age pension and Guaranteed Income Supplement. Maybe our pensioners should apply as refugees!

Consider sending this to all your American friends, so we can all be ticked off and maybe get the refugees cut back to $1,012 and the pensioners up to $2,470.. Then we can enjoy some of the money we were forced to submit to the Government over the last 40 or 50 or 60 years. And not to receive a increase for 2010 Vote them all out of office……."

Yeah, this is all false.

I've noticed that the people who are most interested in voting and the most frothing at the mouth often believe nonsense that arrives via email.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from bigdavediode:

Great, so cut spending. If that's possible, like you claim...

How is cutting spending not possible?

Geeze dave, diode is a perfect alias for you. Diode being a device that only allows to current to flow in one direction. Obviously your neurons only fire in the liberal direction.

 

[Trader666]

We have a spending problem, not a revenue problem, and you can post your moronic drivel until the cows come home but it won't change that basic reality.

Quote from bigdavediode:

Great, so cut spending. If that's possible, like you claim, then it should be no problem to do it the responsible way and cut spending first.

If you say it isn't possible, and you still want tax cuts, then it gives the lie to your statement that you're a fiscal conservative.

 

[Trader666]

This from the one who doesn't even understand basic graphs and axes.

Quote from bigdavediode:

I've noticed that the people who are most interested in voting and the most frothing at the mouth often believe nonsense that arrives via email.

 

[Yannis]

Get Ready Folks

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Lucrum:

How is cutting spending not possible?

It is possible, it's just very, very difficult because everybody wants their piece of the pie protected. You included.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from bigdavediode:

It is possible, it's just very, very difficult because everybody wants their piece of the pie protected. You included.

It's only "difficult" because the spineless career politicians refuse take a chance on alienating a potential voter. At the expense of our nations future.

And what is it than I personally want that makes federal spending reduction so difficult?

 

[phenomena]

LOL!! Dem logic= spending cuts are "too difficult" (because no one has balls and will do what's best for the nation), hence let's do what's easier and raise taxes... since everyone has a "piece of the pie to protect", except of course the tax payers, so let's "protect the pie" and shaft the tax payers ever more.... typical leftist logic from the "fiscal conservative" LOL!!!

Quote from bigdavediode:

It is possible, it's just very, very difficult because everybody wants their piece of the pie protected. You included.

 

[bigdavediode]

Quote from Lucrum:

It's only "difficult" because the spineless career politicians refuse take a chance on alienating a potential voter. At the expense of our nations future.

And what is it than I personally want that makes federal spending reduction so difficult?

The military, for one. Your free hover-round, for two. Your prescription drug coverage, etc. etc. Cuts in federal employees have been made before (under the Democrats, ironically enough) but then people vote in the Republicans and the size of the government grows again.

You can be like Phenomena and pretend it's a party thing, or you can advocate for cuts. What you can't do while calling yourself a fiscal conservative is advocate for cuts and advocate for writing checks from the federal budget before the cuts are made.