Quote from Gayfly1:
The Tea Party is an empty party of catch phrases, as evidenced by the people running for it. This O'Donnell woman is Palin Lite. And Palin is an empty head running an audio loop! And what about that other kook, Paladino? And on and on. If I lived farther away I'd almost wish you guys got what you hope for, much as an unruly kid needs to be allowed to touch a hot stove to finally learn for himself why he shouldn't keep trying to do so.
If these Tea Party candidates are indeed the cartoonish morons they clearly appear to be, then what does that say about the people who vote for them?
Hermit:
More teabagging logic, everyone should be held to the same standard as someone running for office.
And werent these teabaggers supposed to be holier than thou, second coming of the compassionate responsible Conservative, why are they suddenly held to the same level as those lowly 'vote out in November' Dems?![]()
Quote from Hello:
<object style="height: 344px; width: 425px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5hfYJsQAhl0?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5hfYJsQAhl0?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></object>
Quote from Gabfly1:
If you do a search, you will find that I had stated as much repeatedly over time.
Trader666, please don't take this the wrong way, but you should at least try not embarrassing yourself wherever you go. If you don't understand the logical implication of Russell's argument, then it doesn't score you any points to advertise it. You are not smarter than Russell. Get over it. You may not like him. You may not share his views on religion. But you are not going to outwit a noted logician. And despite jem's claim in another thread that Russell's argument no longer applies in today's world, the fact remains that fundamental logic has not changed regarding the disproving of unfalsifiable claims.Quote from Trader666:
This from the cartoonish moron who thinks one can draw a conclusion about the origin of the universe with a flawed analogy about a fictional teapot.
Too bad you don't live in that teapot.
Quote from CaptainObvious:
The Tea Party is saying they would rather lose an election with a candidate that supports their views rather than win with one that doesn't. I tend to agree with that view. If it blows up in their face and the Dems actually hold ground come Novemeber, to hell with it. Let the left keep running the place into the ground, and at some point even the dullest person will get the picture.
Actually jem has a point because the teapot Russell described IS falsifiable. Which Russell didn't realize at the time and shows that his basis for comparing it with God was wrong. Which is a lot more than a quibble if you think about it. Well not YOU, I meant if one thinks about it. But Russell was an atheist with an agenda and so are you so please do continue to worship at his altar of ultimate truth.Quote from Gayfly1:
Trader666, please don't take this the wrong way, but you should at least try not embarrassing yourself wherever you go. If you don't understand the logical implication of Russell's argument, then it doesn't score you any points to advertise it. You are not smarter than Russell. Get over it. You may not like him. You may not share his views on religion. But you are not going to outwit a noted logician.
Quote from Gayfly1:
And despite jem's claim in another thread that Russell's argument no longer applies in today's world, the fact remains that fundamental logic has not changed regarding the disproving of unfalsifiable claims.