Just askin'. How can you be Sure Obama was born in the U.S.?

Quote from wilburbear:

Don't worry, Obama has only 3 or 4 social security numbers.

Coincidentally, Michelle has more than one social security number (but less than 5).
I know.......every aspect of the past for obama/barry s is like a total MINEFIELD.........ALWAYS full on new surprises! :eek:
 
It's obvious, at least to me that you, not some know-nothing reporter who gets paid by the word, or not the political hacks that are hired by networks to spew their nonsense but you and you alone are obsessed by race. However, of course that certainly is your own personal Idaho. And you alone have to live with it.

Good Luck

Quote from bugscoe:



But Wilson’s shocking disrespect for the office of the president — no Democrat ever shouted “liar” at W. when he was hawking a fake case for war in Iraq — convinced me: Some people just can’t believe a black man is president and will never accept it.

Now he’s at the center of a period of racial turbulence sparked by his ascension."
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

It's obvious, at least to me that you, not some know-nothing reporter who gets paid by the word, or not the political hacks that are hired by networks to spew their nonsense but you and you alone are obsessed by race. However, of course that certainly is your own personal Idaho. And you alone have to live with it.

Good Luck

Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

I would be than happy to be shown proof that other credible sources in the MSM or otherwise are as obsessed about race as you appear to be.

Please offer a credible you tube or a link or any credible transcript where anyone on either side of the isle makes such a distinction on race during this tax debate as you have claimed exists.

I was just doing what you asked me to do. Apparently the proof/quotes (and there's plenty more) are no longer of interest to you, much the like the entire MSM who love to use the power of disregard as a form of censorship.

I'll give you an A for Alinsky in trying to turn into a personalized issue with me though.
 
I did say "credible" sources in the MSM OR otherwise. Then you proceeded to quote Maureen Dowd, Matt Laure, Paula Begala etc..etc.. hardly credible hardly credible in my view. But you course you knew and choose to quote them anyway. Which tells me you're aren't interesting in a serious discussion. You're only out to "attempt" to make political points. I say attempt because In my mind you've failed miserably.

I stand firmly behind my original statement. As evidenced by your post's you are obsessed with race. It will be interesting to see if that changes in the future.


Quote from bugscoe:

I was just doing what you asked me to do. Apparently the proof/quotes (and there's plenty more) are no longer of interest to you, much the like the entire MSM who love to use the power of disregard as a form of censorship.

I'll give you an A for Alinsky in trying to turn into a personalized issue with me though.
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

I did say "credible" sources in the MSM OR otherwise. Then you proceeded to quote Maureen Dowd, Matt Laure, Paula Begala etc..etc.. hardly credible hardly credible in my view. But you course you knew and choose to quote them anyway. Which tells me you're aren't interesting in a serious discussion. You're only out to "attempt" to make political points. I say attempt because In my mind you've failed miserably.

I stand firmly behind my original statement. As evidenced by your post's you are obsessed with race. It will be interesting to see if that changes in the future.

And the wheels on the bus go round and round...

Let's keep moving those goals posts so we can avoid the reality I keep smacking you with. And let's make this an issue that hangs on the balance of, not what is said, but what "credible" means as defined by you. And let's keep the focus on me so you can target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize It.

Here is David Gregory trying to make a case for racism in the tea party. Notice the emphasis on the key words, anti-Semites, racists, bigots, hard-core white nationalists, (white) protesters, ideological white supremacy...

DAVID GREGORY, HOST: But, you know, it's--is that point, there are a lot of folks who, supported by the tea party, in the tea party, say, `Oh, there's a mainstream movement.' But there are others who say it is anything but. As a matter of fact, the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights and the NAACP are releasing a report this coming week. And here it is, I'll show it on the screen. The "Tea Party Nationalism, a critical examination of the Tea Party movement and the size, scope and focus of its national factions." And there are some serious charges that I want you to respond to. "The result of this study contravenes many of the Tea Parties' self-invented myths, particularly their sole concentration on budget deficits, taxes, and the power of the federal government. Instead, this report found Tea Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about race and national identity and other so-called social issues. ... Tea party organization have given platforms to anti-Semites, racists and bigots, Further, hard-core white nationalists have been attracted to these protests, looking for potential recruits and hoping to push these (white) protestors toward a more self-conscious and ideological white supremacy." If you're senator, do you think these elements in the tea party need to be dealt with and need to be rebuffed?

The obsession with race lies with the democratic party and all of their bootlicking lackeys in the media. Period.
 
Has there ever been an orginal thought from you?

Quote from bugscoe:

And the wheels on the bus go round and round...

Let's keep moving those goals posts so we can avoid the reality I keep smacking you with. And let's make this an issue that hangs on the balance of, not what is said, but what "credible" means as defined by you. And let's keep the focus on me so you can target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize It.

Here is David Gregory trying to make a case for racism in the tea party. Notice the emphasis on the key words, anti-Semites, racists, bigots, hard-core white nationalists, (white) protesters, ideological white supremacy...

DAVID GREGORY, HOST: But, you know, it's--is that point, there are a lot of folks who, supported by the tea party, in the tea party, say, `Oh, there's a mainstream movement.' But there are others who say it is anything but. As a matter of fact, the Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights and the NAACP are releasing a report this coming week. And here it is, I'll show it on the screen. The "Tea Party Nationalism, a critical examination of the Tea Party movement and the size, scope and focus of its national factions." And there are some serious charges that I want you to respond to. "The result of this study contravenes many of the Tea Parties' self-invented myths, particularly their sole concentration on budget deficits, taxes, and the power of the federal government. Instead, this report found Tea Party ranks to be permeated with concerns about race and national identity and other so-called social issues. ... Tea party organization have given platforms to anti-Semites, racists and bigots, Further, hard-core white nationalists have been attracted to these protests, looking for potential recruits and hoping to push these (white) protestors toward a more self-conscious and ideological white supremacy." If you're senator, do you think these elements in the tea party need to be dealt with and need to be rebuffed?

The obsession with race lies with the democratic party and all of their bootlicking lackeys in the media. Period.
 
Quote from Dr. Zhivodka:

Has there ever been an orginal thought from you?

Here is an original thought:

“The angry faces at Tea Party rallies are eerily familiar. They resemble faces of protesters lining the street at the University of Alabama in 1956 as Autherine Lucy, the school’s first black student, bravely tried to walk to class. Those same jeering faces could be seen gathered around the Arkansas National Guard troopers who blocked nine black children from entering Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957. ‘They moved closer and closer,’ recalled Elizabeth Eckford, one of the Little Rock Nine. ‘Somebody started yelling, “Lynch her! Lynch her!”’”

— The Washington Post’s Colbert King in a March 27 column.
 
Quote from bugscoe:

Here is an original thought:

“The angry faces at Tea Party rallies are eerily familiar. They resemble faces of protesters lining the street at the University of Alabama in 1956 as Autherine Lucy, the school’s first black student, bravely tried to walk to class. Those same jeering faces could be seen gathered around the Arkansas National Guard troopers who blocked nine black children from entering Little Rock’s Central High School in 1957. ‘They moved closer and closer,’ recalled Elizabeth Eckford, one of the Little Rock Nine. ‘Somebody started yelling, “Lynch her! Lynch her!”’”

— The Washington Post’s Colbert King in a March 27 column.

In the view of the Leftists... "The end justifies the means"

Any number of lies

Any number of injustices

Any number of deaths

So long as the Leftist view prevails, ALL heinous acts are OK...

:( :(
 
Back
Top