Quote from Veyron 16.4:
Maybe they put something in the water that people drink here on ET, or maybe I'm just way out on Pluto or something, but did I not say that I cannot post live trades as I have no real way of redacting the profiles AND that not doing so, would reveal "too much" of what I've worked "too hard" to produce?
Did I not say that?
Did I not say that the only thing I could think of, would be to post some results from a demo account, if I had the time? I thought I said that - did I not? Correct, me if I am wrong. Correct me if I did not say that prior to posting these results.
First (and I can't believe I have to explain this), these results are not back-tested results, for crying out loud. These results come from this week - look at the dates. Look at the last date for the last segment closed - it was TODAY - not 10 years ago.
Second, contemporaneous, mechanical trades are real by physical definition. They cannot possibly be anything else. This profile traded here was exactly the same profile that I had running under my actual trading account. However, I am not about to post balances or anything else for that matter, from my actual accounts. So, the only thing I could do was post results from a demo account running in parallel with actual. And, that's exactly what you got - like it or leave it - results are results as long as the system used is mechanical.
Now, if you use a manual system for entry and exit, then your complaint would be valid and logical because anyone can fudge what they "might do" with what the "actually did" prior to closing each position. However, there is no way possible for me to trade such a complex profile manually especially in a market that runs 24 HOURS per day!
What? Is somebody here on "elite" going to tell me that I had on sleep this week? That I stayed up since Monday when the positions were first entered and never closed my eyes as I manually maneuvered my way to picking-off points at which I would close positions? If so, that would be on par for this forum, but it would also be silly.
Mechanical, contemporaneous, profiled (stops and limits) trades, done any way against live market data, is proof positive that something either worked or did not work.
Show me the trader who does not test their ideas first, before going to market with them in real-time, and I'll show you somebody pretending to be a real trader.
So, if anyone uses paper to proof their theories about what they will do in live trading and then turn around in the exact same breath and throw stones at those same paper proofs, then that would be the absolute height of irrational behavior and hypocrisy for the trader. Not to mention completely illogical.
You cannot define a proof as being valid for future expectations and then turn right around and invalidate that SAME kind of proof when it does not fit the curve of your ulterior motive to debunk one using the EXACT same proofing methodology.
Case in point.
And the reason why you're going overboard to prove that you are legit on an anonymous internet forum is because..?!?!?....
Dude, get off of your mommy's computer and go get laid...