Jussie Smollett Charges Dropped To Protect Obama’s Involvement

Wrong analogy. If the robber points his gun at a teller but doesn't get any money, that's a crime. Mooooler found NO CRIME, nor an attempt to commit a crime.
You are correct and so is our resident lefty, in a way. Looking for obstruction is a tried and true tactic used by the feds when they know the original change is completely bogus. Muller couldn't find any solid evidence of the original crime alleged, which he and everyone else knew day one. That fabricated charge,(incidentally illegal to do), gave him the open door to look for anything and everything else. He found nothing directly connected to Trump, nor did he find any adequate evidence of Trump obstructing anything at all. Best he could do was throw the left a bone to gnaw on until 2020 and give his wishy washy opinion regarding obstruction. All in all the left has come out ahead so far. This scam gave them victories in 2018 and a springboard for 2020.
 
That's not how it works, but you know that, and you and I know you've been trolling the last few posts you've made. "Your honor, you must drop the armed robbery charges since my client left the bank empty handed"

But on this logic, your side will be convicted, having tried to steal an election from a candidate who campaigned according to the law, toward the electoral college, and the people who voted lawfully for him.

Just because they didn't succeed in their coup d'etat (didn't get the cash) doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes by pointing their guns. Besides, they did get cash. About $25 million for the Mooooler report (not to mention the harm getting that report did to multiple bystanders caught in the crossfire).
 
Looks like Rahm Emmanuel and Trump are on the same page with this. Include the Chicago Chief of Police, the FBI and the DOJ, it does not look good for the Obama connected fixers.

I hope they nail the judge and the prosecutor for any crimes they have committed! Jussie Smollet can still be charged under the Federal laws of mailing that powder to himself! Maybe, all of them can be cell mates? No way should this farce be allowed to stand!
 
Smollett says Nigerian brothers wore white-face.
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainme...j-fbi-investigation-nothing-improper-was-done
I can see how one could make the mistake
Abel-Osundairo-1-Bola-You-Tube (1).jpg
 
Wrong analogy. If the robber points his gun at a teller but doesn't get any money, that's a crime. Mooooler found NO CRIME, nor an attempt to commit a crime.

And that's fine and dandy, but Trump still impeded the investigation pre and post Comey. The president doesn't get to decide which legitimate investigations the DOJ gets to pursue. Let's not forget Mueller found wrong doing by the Russians, which is what Comey originally set out to do.

And just because there was no collusion on the election front, it doesn't mean Trump couldn't obstruct in fear of what else could be dug out, even if ultimately Mueller did not charge.
 
But on this logic, your side will be convicted, having tried to steal an election from a candidate who campaigned according to the law, toward the electoral college, and the people who voted lawfully for him.

Just because they didn't succeed in their coup d'etat (didn't get the cash) doesn't mean they didn't commit crimes by pointing their guns. Besides, they did get cash. About $25 million for the Mooooler report (not to mention the harm getting that report did to multiple bystanders caught in the crossfire).

Are the walls closing in on the " deep state"?
 
And that's fine and dandy, but Trump still impeded the investigation pre and post Comey. The president doesn't get to decide which legitimate investigations the DOJ gets to pursue. Let's not forget Mueller found wrong doing by the Russians, which is what Comey originally set out to do.

And just because there was no collusion on the election front, it doesn't mean Trump couldn't obstruct in fear of what else could be dug out, even if ultimately Mueller did not charge.

So you're saying Trump was wrong to preclude a DRAGNET investigation based on a false charge to begin with?

Russian wrongdoing? If some random Russian citizens bought $100k worth of Facebook ads, that does not comport with the false charges brought against Trump, and does not justify this farce at all. Hillary's (false) charge was that the Russian government intended to weaponize information, and that they were "guided" by Trump as to just how to point and fire that info. Neither of which are true (both false, both fake news).

You forget, there were no investigations that Trump knew of that he could impede. All he knew was Comey was a strange, untrustworthy dude, a sentiment Rosenstein himself agreed with prior to the firing, in a letter he sent to the President.
 
Are the walls closing in on the " deep state"?

Interesting choice of words. Several media pundits used to talk about a noose closing in around Trump's neck. So yah, imo, anyone in his administration, who is complicit with this coup d'etat, who is hiding out in the deep state, should start feeling the walls of a prison closing in.
 
Last edited:
sorry that comment was aimed at the 85.

You are being very cute there.
As an attorney you took criminal law.
You know the difference between attempted crimes and not having the mens rea because there was no crime underneath to obstruct.

In short if Trump knew he or his family did not do something illegal with Russia he could fire comey for any reason in the world including... to cause an end to the waste of resources and time investigation or just simply to stop the investigation into a non crime.

Even Rosenstein agreed per the memo that the fact there was no illegal collusion meant there was no obstruction of justice.

No justice was obstructed because there was no crime.
 
Back
Top