Jury Awards Trading Technologies $15.9M In Royalty Row

[CliffordHarris]

Anyone see this? Looks like TT was awarded $16m from CQG.

https://www.law360.com/articles/634903/ill-jury-awards-trading-technologies-15-9m-in-royalty-row

 

[bathrobe]

Anyone see this? Looks like TT was awarded $16m from CQG.

https://www.law360.com/articles/634903/ill-jury-awards-trading-technologies-15-9m-in-royalty-row

This is how TT makes a great deal of money, they sue everyone who offers a static dom. CQG's AS is also quite similar.

 

[marketsurfer]

Anyone see this? Looks like TT was awarded $16m from CQG.

https://www.law360.com/articles/634903/ill-jury-awards-trading-technologies-15-9m-in-royalty-row

my bet is they never collect. surf

 

[RobertG]

my bet is they never collect. surf

Amen!

From what I see it's a functionality. How was this awarded as a patent?

 

[CliffordHarris]

my bet is they never collect. surf

Surf. Just curious why you think they will not collect? I am not sure where this is in the legal process, I assume it can be appealed?