July was Earth's hottest month ever recorded

Correlation (especially when the CO2 is lagging) is not causation.

And can you point to one peer-reviewed scientific paper that conclusively states that any global temperature is caused by man-made CO2? Just one paper, eh?

AGW is just an unproven theory. Every year more data comes out which disproves it.

Look! I'm agreeing with you!! This sudden rise in temps which is melting all the ice is just natural variation from cosmic rays or something and not from the 42% rise in the earth's most important greenhouse gas. Tyndall, back in 1860, was wrong about his lab measurements of greenhouse gasses and no-one has corrected him since.
 
More phony data! This time at Washington, DC Reagan National airport.
=========================

August 20, 2015

The Latest Climate Kerfuffle
ByPatrick Michaels


Are political considerations superseding scientific ones at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration?

When confronted with an obviously broken weather station that was reading way too hot, they replaced the faulty sensor — but refused to adjust the bad readings it had already taken. And when dealing with "the pause" in global surface temperatures that is in its 19th year, the agency threw away satellite-sensed sea-surface temperatures, substituting questionable data that showed no pause.

more at:
http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html


Forgot to add this very important part from the article:

" Over a third of this year's 37 90-degree-plus days, which gives us a remote chance of breaking the all time record, should also be eliminated, putting this summer rightly back into normal territory."

They don't want to change the data because it will make the weather look 'normal'.
Something that is anathema to them.
 
Forgot to add this very important part from the article:

" Over a third of this year's 37 90-degree-plus days, which gives us a remote chance of breaking the all time record, should also be eliminated, putting this summer rightly back into normal territory."

They don't want to change the data because it will make the weather look 'normal'.
Something that is anathema to them.


Did you say something?
 
More phony data! This time at Washington, DC Reagan National airport.
=========================

August 20, 2015

The Latest Climate Kerfuffle
ByPatrick Michaels


Are political considerations superseding scientific ones at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration?

When confronted with an obviously broken weather station that was reading way too hot, they replaced the faulty sensor — but refused to adjust the bad readings it had already taken. And when dealing with "the pause" in global surface temperatures that is in its 19th year, the agency threw away satellite-sensed sea-surface temperatures, substituting questionable data that showed no pause.

more at:
http://www.realclearpolicy.com/blog/2015/08/20/the_latest_climate_kerfuffle_1397.html



Oh wow, look at the author...

Patrick Michaels is director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute.

Now, most people would say "Hey! That guy is a right wing think tank whore and not a climatologist!" .

But not dumb righties. It's like they want to be sheep. Of don't have clue what the Cato Inst is. Or both.
 
Oh wow, look at the author...

Patrick Michaels is director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute.

Now, most people would say "Hey! That guy is a right wing think tank whore and not a climatologist!" .

But not dumb righties. It's like they want to be sheep. Of don't have clue what the Cato Inst is. Or both.


I just did a little experiment. Bumped the article from realclearpolitics again to see how long it would take you to try to 'drown it out'.

Skeptical Science: "Drown Them Out"

Skeptical Science members are organizing themselves into eco-strike squads to "drown out".

Crusher crews.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/09/skeptical-science-drown-them-out.html

Spending every minute of your day to keep that 4 billion dollars a day flowing to the con men.
And you get all of $0 of it.

Stupid pawn. lmao
 
I just did a little experiment. Bumped the article from realclearpolitics again to see how long it would take you to try to 'drown it out'.

Skeptical Science: "Drown Them Out"

Skeptical Science members are organizing themselves into eco-strike squads to "drown out".

Crusher crews.

http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/09/skeptical-science-drown-them-out.html

Spending every minute of your day to keep that 4 billion dollars a day flowing to the con men.
And you get all of $0 of it.

Stupid pawn. lmao


So you admit and realize that your chart is complete horse shit then and the source is about as biased as could be right? And going forward you will not allow yourself to be right wing sheep and will get your science from authoritative sources.

Oh who are we kidding.
 
So you admit and realize that your chart is complete horse shit then and the source is about as biased as could be right? And going forward you will not allow yourself to be right wing sheep and will get your science from authoritative sources.

Oh who are we kidding.

What grade are you going into this fall?
 
fc is probably out of school. He sells a greenhouse gas 2000 times more potent than co2 for a living. In his world he is an eco terrorist.

In mine he is just a confused person making a living. Perhaps he would be even worth having a beer with.
 
Back
Top