Judicial Watch Calls BS On Gowdy Bengahzi Investigation

A

AAAintheBeltway

Anyone remember the Benghazi investigation, started with great fanfare and Fox News interviews? Nope, me either. It kind of sank beneath the surface, almost like the people running it really didn't have their hearts in it. Kind of reminds me of Romney's big wimp out in the third debate on the same issue.

Trey Gowdy was going to ride this to big things, maybe the Speakership or even the WH. Instead, nothing basically, except the usual democrat whining.

Now Judicial Watch, which is pretty much the only outfit that accomplishes anything against Obama/Clinton, has called out the House investigation as bungled and incompetent. Since JW has uncovered the bulk of the damaging info on Hillary's abuse of national security, secret emails, etc, they have some credibility on the issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...conservative-group-goes-after-benghazi-panel/

The kind of simple incompetency we've come to expect from republicans or orders from on high to bury it?
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Anyone remember the Benghazi investigation, started with great fanfare and Fox News interviews? Nope, me either. It kind of sank beneath the surface, almost like the people running it really didn't have their heart
More...
Because 17 previous panels had failed to find anything real.
 
AAAintheBeltway said:
Anyone remember the Benghazi investigation, started with great fanfare and Fox News interviews? Nope, me either. It kind of sank beneath the surface, almost like the people running it really didn't have their hearts in it. Kind of reminds me of Romney's big wimp out in the third debate on the same issue.

Trey Gowdy was going to ride this to big things, maybe the Speakership or even the WH. Instead, nothing basically, except the usual democrat whining.

Now Judicial Watch, which is pretty much the only outfit that accomplishes anything against Obama/Clinton, has called out the House investigation as bungled and incompetent. Since JW has uncovered the bulk of the damaging info on Hillary's abuse of national security, secret emails, etc, they have some credibility on the issue.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...conservative-group-goes-after-benghazi-panel/

The kind of simple incompetency we've come to expect from republicans or orders from on high to bury it?
More...
Gowdy should be executed for wasting oxygen ordinary Americans need to survive. Talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of vicotory. 13 hours and all he did was prove unlike Trump implies, she has a lot of stamina.

Benghazi could have happened on anybodys watch, from Eisenhower to Obama.

All he had to ask, and it would have taken only minutes is, "Why a few weeks before the Presidential election did you try to make this attack on 9/11 seem like it was just a spontaneous reaction to an Egyptian anti Moslem video instead of informing the American People that we have just sustained another 9/11 coordinated planned attack by Al Qaeda or another Al Kida like group?"
 
Gowdy botched the investigation and hearings, it is simple incompetence.

Clinton/Obama ignored intelligence indicating an attack failing to augment security after repeated requests by Ambassador Stevens. Then once attacked Clinton/Obama restrained the CIA and military from protecting embassy personnel and let Ambassador Stevens and the security staff fend for themselves and they were killed. Subsequently everyone was briefed to blame the whole attack on an anti-islamic film nobody ever heard of when they knew it was an organized terrorist attack.

If you can't investigate that or hold a proper hearing you are incompetent and Gowdy as has proven to be. He is a nothing burger.
 
I've seen Gowdy on Fox and he doesn't seem incompetent. Maybe he was just a small time SC prosecutor and not ready for prime time and the juice Hillary Clinton could call upon. Maybe. Or maybe someone didn't really want Benghazi looked into too carefully. Whether it is because of the need to block Trump or the fear of exposing CIA dirty laundry, I can't say. But ET and Snark nailed it. If you can't make something out of the Secretary of State orchestrating a disinformation campaign to cover up a monumental series of blunders, you maybe should get in a different line of work. Like lawn maintenance maybe.
 
Benghazi-Press-Kit_Widespread-Criticism.png


http://benghazicommittee.com/benghazi-by-the-numbers/
 
Snarkhund said:
Gowdy botched the investigation and hearings, it is simple incompetence.

Clinton/Obama ignored intelligence indicating an attack failing to augment security after repeated requests by Ambassador Stevens. Then once attacked Clinton/Obama restrained the CIA and military from protecting embassy personnel and let Ambassador Stevens and the security staff fend for themselves and they were killed. Subsequently everyone was briefed to blame the whole attack on an anti-islamic film nobody ever heard of when they knew it was an organized terrorist attack.

If you can't investigate that or hold a proper hearing you are incompetent and Gowdy as has proven to be. He is a nothing burger.
More...

Facts really don't matter to you do they?
 
Facts?

The fact is that when the 3 AM call came Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama failed to provide leadership which directly resulted in the death of a United States Ambassador and 2 CIA security guys. Subsequently Clinton and Obama both propagated the lie that the attack was a "random protest" caused by an "islamophobic film" when they had advance warning of an organized terror attack.

Recently Clinton claimed that "not one person was lost in Libya" which must come as a surprise to the families of the CIA security personnel and the mother of Amb. Stevens.

The democrats are a complete disaster when it comes to foreign policy and they are making the world very dangerous.
 
Snarkhund said:
Facts?

The fact is that when the 3 AM call came Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama failed to provide leadership which directly resulted in the death of a United States Ambassador and 2 CIA security guys. Subsequently Clinton and Obama both propagated the lie that the attack was a "random protest" caused by an "islamophobic film" when they had advance warning of an organized terror attack.

Recently Clinton claimed that "not one person was lost in Libya" which must come as a surprise to the families of the CIA security personnel and the mother of Amb. Stevens.

The democrats are a complete disaster when it comes to foreign policy and they are making the world very dangerous.
More...
Apparently this is not what the various bi-partisan and even completely rep panels found when looking into it. I would assume they have better access to all the actual evidence than, say, zerohedge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top