Since you seem genuinely clueless, I don't mind educating you. I assume you couldn't read back in 2000, aka you are young.
1.I think you are getting to the fact that initially BTC was said to be a payment system.
2.That being said, more value was settled (read transacted) on the BTC blockchain last year than Visa!
3.No idea what you mean re "betaversion".
4.Bitcoin hasn't really changed since it began
5. So tell me how pets.com (which made no money) is the same thing as a decentralized network
1. Yeah. I have an invention, it is a tiny anti-gravity machine, but right now it only works as a paperweight. Nothing wrong with repurposing objects, but the constant goalpost moving by crypto fans is getting ridiculous. AS a payment/currency bitcoin has failed. End of story.
And I meant here various originally claimed features too, that turned out to be not true, like anonymous, cheap tx, fast tx, etc.
2. This is highly irrelevant because 99.99% of it was trading, not exchanging it for products and services.
3. A beta version refers to a state of a new product that is not ready for the market. Google beta testers...
4. That is not a positive thing. It is hugely negative. There are plenty of better, technologically more advanced cryptos out there. Bitcoin is OBSOLETE.
5. Not technologically, but:
a/ Fundamentally. None of them have much, if any intrinsic value. A Statoshi should be worth as much as a pets.com share, I guess collector's value.
b/ Financially: They both were valued on hype and greed and FOMO, not usefulness or by any other financial standard.
c/ Timing wise: When a new product shows up in the Super Bowl ads specially by multiple advertisers, that product usually has jumped the shark. Similar to the highest skyscraper being built at the top of a business cycle.