Judge says Michael Flynn agreed to provide 'substantial assistance for prosecution of another person

If it is perfectly lawful and above the board, why did Flynn lie about it?

Give me a simple answer.
I'm not like you. I won't put forth conjecture about why somebody did something unless I know. ---I have no idea what Flynn's motivation was. For all I know he pled guilty when he was innocent----don't know.
 
I'm not like you. I won't put forth conjecture about why somebody did something unless I know. ---I have no idea what Flynn's motivation was. For all I know he pled guilty when he was innocent----don't know.

Right, when it comes to Trump's criminals you don't know anything but when it comes to Democrats or Clinton, you are quick to jump to conclusions and accept the worst case scenario.
 
Right, when it comes to Trump's criminals you don't know anything but when it comes to Democrats or Clinton, you are quick to jump to conclusions and accept the worst case scenario.
Actually there are a lot of known facts, many from Comey's mouth himself in regard to Clintons. I don't know people's motivations like you do though. ---I have yet to see any evidence of scandal with regard to Trump.
 
Actually there are a lot of known facts, many from Comey's mouth himself in regard to Clintons. I have yet to see any evidence of scandal with regard to Trump.

Maybe you need to watch the testimony again

 
What did they get wrong exactly? Be specific.

Also, did you employ the same standard with the Uranium One story that has gone completely cold again after the BS flare up?


Hmmmm...... i must have missed it when the uranium one story went cold, did Hillary not really take 140 million dollars from the russians and then make a favourable decision for them which led to uranium leaving the country at the behest of the russians? What are the new updates that caused this story to go "cold?"
 
Hmmmm...... i must have missed it when the uranium one story went cold, did Hillary not really take 140 million dollars from the russians and then make a favourable decision for them which led to uranium leaving the country at the behest of the russians? What are the new updates that caused this story to go "cold?"
Max, can you tell us what the motivations were for Hillary taking the money and making the favorable decision? The money and the decision are known facts but I'm not quite clear on the why.
 
Hmmmm...... i must have missed it when the uranium one story went cold, did Hillary not really take 140 million dollars from the russians and then make a favourable decision for them which led to uranium leaving the country at the behest of the russians? What are the new updates that caused this story to go "cold?"

When five Congressional committees led by Republicans were unable to find any evidence and DOJ didn't take up the investigation. And whatever happened to the 'witness' that was going to testify, where did he run away to?

And by the way, the guy who gave 135 million was a CANADIAN and didn't have any shares in U1 and donated when Clinton was not even SoS. All this precludes the fact that she had no powers to make any decisions.
 
Max, can you tell us what the motivations were for Hillary taking the money and making the favorable decision? The money and the decision are known facts but I'm not quite clear on the why.

Hillary made the decision?

Weren't you bitching and whining about facts just a minute ago and now you are outright lying about Hillary making a decision that was neither in her purview or capacity as SoS.

So much for your rant on 'facts'.
 
Back
Top