Judge rejects Stein's request for hand recount

Judges have always been in the republicans' pocket, so what else is new.
Yes, but the democrats have had the big one, namely U.S. Attorney General in their hands for 8 years. Not to mention half of the Supreme Court.

Time to get out that phone book and randomly look for some new names. Did you buy a lottery ticket? Winner gets to be a judge for life.
 
Judges have always been in the republicans' pocket, so what else is new.

Considering that all the left leaning papers such as the Washington Post have stated the recount will not alter the results of the presidential race and stated the judge has no grounds to grant it. This is hardly surprising.
 
Thats why I voted Trump! We win so much we're going to get sick of winning and say "Please Mr. Trump, can we stop winning so much?" And he'll say "NO! We're going to keep winning because we're going to make America great again!"

The pills you take seem awesome, can I have some?
 
"...saying that the two campaigns did not show a hand recount, though more thorough, was necessary or show there was a clear and convincing evidence of fraud or other problems."

But your president-elect just said the election was rife with fraud.
 
"...saying that the two campaigns did not show a hand recount, though more thorough, was necessary or show there was a clear and convincing evidence of fraud or other problems."

But your president-elect just said the election was rife with fraud.
Rigged and fraud are two separate things, kinda'. Yeah, it's splitting hairs but it's a hair worth splitting. There isn't enough fraud to warrant a recount, but a biased media is worth looking into. I watched a Stein interview where she said if there is any chance of fraud that warrants a recount, which is a ridiculous premise. In a less than perfect world there will always be some "chance". This is nothing more than a sour grapes loser looking to spend OPM on a fools errand, and probably make a few bucks for herself.
 
Back
Top