Judge Napolitano on Manafort Indictment: ‘This is the First of Many Dominoes to Fall’

jem said:
Also we need to make sure we investigate the clinton and dnc crime families.
.
More...

You guys have investigated Clintons for 30 years - no indictments - NOTHING

You guys had investigative committees since 2010 spending millions - NOTHING

You guys had the DOJ for a year - not even an investigation, let alone a special investigator.

Your allegations are nothing but propaganda, there is zero truth to it otherwise there would have been some tangible results from all the claims you keep making.
 
Slartibartfast said:
????

All you every do when trying to find solid ground is whatabout Hillary. Its your default level, I'm lonely, I need people to give me attention, What about Hillary!!!!!
More...


You guys are getting twitchy about there being too much talk about Hillary.

That's fine. I understand. There are many more dominoes to fall in regard to Hillary. And yes, I will be watching and pointing it out to you as we go along.

Thanks for your continuing interest. Perhaps you need to follow me on twitter when I set up an account just to report on legal issues related to Hillary. No need to thank me. It's not just for you.
 
looks like Napolitano had it correct.
Clinton Crime family bagman Tony Podesta steps down today...
It looks like he is Company A in the indictment with Mannafort.


https://www.nbcnews.com/news/invest...up-mercury-are-companies-b-indictment-n815721


WASHINGTON — The lobbying firms the Podesta Group and Mercury Public Affairs are the unnamed companies in the grand jury indictment of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and his deputy, Rick Gates, according to three sources with knowledge of the investigation.

The indictment, unsealed Monday, refers to "Company A" and "Company B" as the firms Manafort and Gates solicited in 2012 to lobby on behalf of the Ukranian government. Company A is Mercury Public Affairs and Company B is the Podesta Group, the sources said.

The revelation of the companies’ identities points to more details about the players involved in the high-stakes venture run by Manafort and Gates to push the interest of a pro-Russia Ukranian political party inside the United States. It also provides a glimpse into the material special prosecutor Robert Mueller has corroborated on both companies and the potential legal repercussions both groups could face.
 
so other than the fact Tony and John once owned the company together and we have no idea how they share the spoils ..of their corruption.

we know Tony was always calling hillary...
We know the Clinton foundation got millions from Putin...
and thanks to wikileaks...

we know John was involved in spreading the power or wealth around to get this deal approved...

wikileaks also crushes this connection between John Podesta and Clinton peddling her influence on the Uranium One scandal...

gets the CFIUS guy a position board of trustees for the Center for American Progress with Podesta himself. I wonder if there is a stipend or this is just a huge resume stuffer for him and Gibson Dunn.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: "Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that "Jose Fernandez has personally attested that 'Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter',” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: "Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I'm finding extremely rewarding."
 
jem said:
so other than the fact Tony and John once owned the company together and we have no idea how they share the spoils ..of their corruption.

we know Tony was always calling hillary...
We know the Clinton foundation got millions from Putin...
and thanks to wikileaks...

we know John was involved in spreading the power or wealth around to get this deal approved...

wikileaks also crushes this connection between John Podesta and Clinton peddling her influence on the Uranium One scandal...

gets the CFIUS guy a position board of trustees for the Center for American Progress with Podesta himself. I wonder if there is a stipend or this is just a huge resume stuffer for him and Gibson Dunn.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: "Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): "John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign".

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that "Jose Fernandez has personally attested that 'Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter',” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie "Clinton Cash" by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: "Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I'm finding extremely rewarding."
More...


You guys have been waiting 20+ years for a Clinton conviction.Nothing wrong with waiting another 20 years I guess LOL !!!
 
so far one impeachment.
one presidential campaign loss - this was a massive success.

that is 2 down and one or two to go.

By the way... I am not happy about it.
I would have preferred if they had not sold out our stealth technology and and our uranium.
 
Tony Stark said:
You guys have been waiting 20+ years for a Clinton conviction.Nothing wrong with waiting another 20 years I guess LOL !!!
More...


And those who have been unwilling to look the other way in regard to Clinton corruption are the ones who have been leaders in making sure that she was not elected in either 2008 or 2016. So it is not as though there have not been victories along the way, even though she has not been jailed.

Just a couple weeks ago, Hillary was trying to rise again and position herself as the leader of the opposition. Then the focus on her corruption - uranium deal, Russian kgb ties etc- popped up and she suddenly went back to the Price Is Right.

Yup. Staying on top of Clinton corruption has been a decades long duty for all true Americans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jem
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top