At least Dimon wouldn't have the strong ties to Wall St that Geithner has ... right?
Quote from ralph00:
1. Geithner isn't going anywhere. The earliest he would leave would be after the mid-term elections if the Dems get whupped.
2. Eliot Spitzer should be Treas Sec
Quote from truehawk:
If Geithner stays the Demos will get wooped.
But worse and more to the point the COUNTRY will continue to get screwed by the Wall Street enablers.
Eliot Spitzer for Treasury Sec and
Brooksley Born for SEC Chair
Elizabeth Warren for FDIC Chair.
Yes
Dimon over my dead keyboard, he is exactly more of what we are in the process of tarring and feathering and running out of town on a rail.
Quote from Debaser82:
Itâs not clear heâs going anywhere but if Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner were to lose his job, JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon is emerging as a potential replacement, the New York Post reported.
A number of policy makers have begun mentioning Dimon as a successor to Geithner, who has come under new attacks over his handling of the U.S. economy and ties to Wall Street, the paper reported, citing unnamed sources.
Still, it seems unlikely at this point that President Barack Obama would accept Geithnerâs resignation. And even if he did, it might be tough to convince Dimon to give up his big salary at JPMorgan, which has been seen as one of the healthiest U.S. banks.
People familiar with Dimonâs thinking told the Post he âwould love to serve his countryâ but that he believes Geithner is doing âa good jobâ and plans to stay at JPMorgan for another âsix or seven years.â Dimon was considered a candidate to lead the Treasury Department last year after Obama was elected.
http://www.foxbusiness.com/story/ma...hase-ceo-emerges-treasury-secretary-canidate/
