Journal

[nonpln]

Of course. And not only bc you're on demo.

First and foremost my goal is to trade properly, but the end result is money. So, if I trade properly and I get paid from it. Why would I care if it's demo? Other than the risk that yes the company may shut down, but already aware of that.

He doesn't even intra-day trade.

 

[poopy]

First and foremost my goal is to trade properly, but the end result is money. So, if I trade properly and I get paid from it. Why would I care if it's demo? Other than the risk that yes the company may shut down, but already aware of that.

He doesn't even intra-day trade.

You have this plebe/newb idea that trading intraday frequency is somehow an advantage or edge. That being flat EOD is optimal. You're so clueless that it's comical.

 

[Specterx]

You have to be fuckin shitting me. Go read some of the post and journals from the people commenting in my thread. It's objective garbage, yet they come on here to troll.

Not going to sit here and type out a bunch of shit to people who want to troll on an online forum.

So no color then? Oh well. Good luck w/ your journal.

 

[poopy]

First and foremost my goal is to trade properly, but the end result is money. So, if I trade properly and I get paid from it. Why would I care if it's demo? Other than the risk that yes the company may shut down, but already aware of that.

He doesn't even intra-day trade.

They pay out on demo gains? Where do I sign up?

 

[nonpln]

You have this plebe/newb idea that trading intraday frequency is somehow an advantage or edge. That being flat EOD is optimal. You're so clueless that it's comical.

No, I don't think that. I am already aware that's where most people derive their edge or advantage from is time, in some way shape or form.

I do not have the finances for that, yes that is my own fault. None the less the most optimal way currently for me was to design something that is intra-day with edge to take advantage of prop firms. Hence that's what I did.

It's not an idea, it's clear everywhere here. People have very poor view of intra-day. Just go look at the ES journal today. Not one person mentioned context, not one person gave any levels (much less ones that reacted immediately and actually meant something). What do they mention? multi-day trades.

There's a lot of things working against me. Well aware I don't have some of the advantages others have. Thankfully I don't need them as what I've developed is strong enough to carry me through.

 

[nonpln]

They pay out on demo gains? Where do I sign up?

Not even trying to be a smart ass, but the fact that you even ask this question means you obviously don't understand what I am doing or the type of trading. Guess that makes sense why you keep asking for s/p. Still I've explained in multiple times, it shouldn't be that hard difficult to figure out why I cannot most my mnq trades via typing.

 

[nonpln]

@poopy please man I am moving towards the definition of efficiency. there is nothing efficient about arguing with people online. If no one believes I am onto something that's fine go live for your life, sit back and enjoy watching me fail.

 

[poopy]

Not even trying to be a smart ass, but the fact that you even ask this question means you obviously don't understand what I am doing or the type of trading. Guess that makes sense why you keep asking for s/p. Still I've explained in multiple times, it shouldn't be that hard difficult to figure out why I cannot most my mnq trades via typing.

They do not pay out on demo. Success on the demo opens you to a funded account, which in most cases the "funded" account is internalized and a scam. Regardless, you're NOT PAID ON DEMO (unless the funded account is internalized).

Edit: by internalized I am referring to the deposit-prop orders netted internally, i.e., they never hit the tape. Due to the failure rate of you losers it's a profitable scam biz-model between demo fees and internalizing orders.

 

[nonpln]

They do not pay out on demo. Success on the demo opens you to a funded account, which in most cases the "funded" account is internalized and a scam. Regardless, you're NOT PAID ON DEMO (unless the funded account is internalized).

Edit: by internalized I am referring to the deposit-prop orders netted internally, i.e., they never hit the tape. Due to the failure rate of you losers it's a profitable scam biz-model between demo fees and internalizing orders.

They still pay out. Don't know why you state the obvious to me every time. Understand you think I know nothing, but I am telling you I've did my research.

How else would they pay people out? Obviously the fee's other people pay when the fail go towards paying out anyone who meets the requirements to get paid. You give yourself too much credit, as if you have insider knowledge. I think most people of even moderate intelligence would figure that out relatively quickly.

So, let's say you got me now you get to be "Right" yay! congratulations. Can you explain to me how that changes or invalidates my macro statement? I said my goal is to trade properly, which will lead to money.

So, live, demo, internalized or whatever. One still gets paid if they trade within the rules. Do you seriously think I care which one it is, as long as I get paid? Again, no. Yes, there is a risk they get shut down. Of course that's also a logical conclusion for anyone with reasonable intelligence.

 

[nonpln]

They do not pay out on demo. Success on the demo opens you to a funded account, which in most cases the "funded" account is internalized and a scam. Regardless, you're NOT PAID ON DEMO (unless the funded account is internalized).

Edit: by internalized I am referring to the deposit-prop orders netted internally, i.e., they never hit the tape. Due to the failure rate of you losers it's a profitable scam biz-model between demo fees and internalizing orders.

btw not going to give you an education. But some do move you to actual live and some don't. You have not fully researched this topic in depth, please don't pretend like you have.