Out of curiosity, after you reach a channel bottom, do you think it is appropriate to take a long, expecting price to move back up to the channel top? Don't get me wrong, in a down channel, it perhaps only makes sense to take the shorts at the channel tops, but given that here you also have a moving average, and I think typically people think of a MA as a support or resistance level, so a channel bottom along with the MA might be seen as a good reason for a long. In fact, your short, being right at the MA, and at the same level as the previous swing low is kind of risky, which is just my opinion of course.
I have always liked your channels, and you seem to use them quite successfully. But what emphasis do you put into the MA? How does it help you take a trade? Because my humble opinion is that if it doesn't really add to the decision to enter a trade, then maybe its just a distraction?
Thanks for the comment! I think in certain situations you could go long in the bottom of a downward channel. Maybe if its a very large, broad channel and you are playing a smaller upwards channel within it. But yeah in general its just easy for me to compartmentalize things by sticking to the dominant side.
I agree, going short into those lows and the 200ema added some risk. If the trade had lost that would probably be my excuse. But the tightness/neatness of the bar pattern there, and the way they were pushing downwards off of the 21ema and the midline of the channel is what sealed it for me. My thought was that uptrend had played out, and there would be stops under that low from late buyers (i know because I've been the late buyer lately lol).
As far as MA's go, I use them dynamically. With the 200, depending on context I might avoid entering anywhere around it altogether. For example if its flat and positioned in the middle of a range, and price is clinging to it. However, if its flat but price is disrespecting it and swinging widely above and below it, then I'm not as worried about it. If the 200 is sloped, it serves as a reminder to me of the bigger trend at play, helps me avoid trying to pick bottoms/tops.
The 21 factors in more directly on a trade by trade basis. Im watching for flatness as a hint towards congestion, comparing how far price is traveling away from it on sequences of swings in a trend, using it as a warning not to chase prices too much on an impulse move, reminder to wait for a pullback, etc.
I tend not to think of them as support or resistance because ultimately I think its a random line. For example when prices bounce perfectly off the 200, I dont think anything special happened. Any and every ma length will look like support or resistance at some point. Maybe the 200 on a daily tf for a stock or something is meaningful if tons of people watch it but the way I use them, they are just a visual guide that I use to compare, measure, see patterns, guide behavior, and take tons of little cues from.
Maybe if I showed that chart in larger context I could better explain why i wasn't worried about it. At any rate thanks for asking, its really interesting to me how challenging it is to actually put this stuff into words. Its actually very hard to write about something so technical yet "artistic" and try not to give the impression that I think I'm smarter or better at trading than I am. I suppose it would be similar to trying to write about some aspect of playing guitar, like how to position your hand and hold the pick to achieve certain tones/dynamics. Seems simple in my head until I try to explain it. Thanks for the exercise!