Aside from it needing to be said, perhaps Stewart's piece on Cramer and its timing was implicitly something of a glass house thing. Not to mention "let's review the judgment and credibility of the source," an exercise sorely lacking in the media.Quote from forrestang:
Cramer is douche, he's always annoyed me.
But.....It's funny how Stuart all of a sudden got the "courage" to complain about Cramer AFTER Cramer admittedly started questioning the Messiah's choices on the economy.
I'd bet if Cramer never mentioned anything about it, there would have been no interview.
Now.....not that Cramer hasn't done this himself, but the agenda of the MSM is to rally around the Messiah, to discredit anyone disapproving of those policies.
Just my opinion obviously...
Jon Stewart Just Crucified Cramer & CNBC
- Thread starter ess1096
- Start date
dude...stewart is a comedian, an actor...can we take any of this seriously?...no!
like "professional" wrestiling...WWE, WWF etc.
And yet it took a comedian to bring Cramer down to size while the rest of the media continues napping.
If you came out with a well documented presentation, with irrefutable evidence presented in a professional way, and you're target had no defense except "uh, well, maybe, well, perhaps, should have, maybe, done a better job,", I'd give youcredence.
Why not Stewart? He was phenominal. I know how phenomenal. Because I made cogent presentations to reporters. They did nothing.
I agree with this theory 100% --and Cramer was already in the Whitehouse crosshairs when the Cramer Vs Stewart fued started-- but it was actually Santelli that was targeted by Stewart originally. Cramer just got caught in the net because he was insulted and shot his mouth off.
And to those who don't take it seriously because Jon Stewart is an "entertainer", the sad fact is that most of America's youth get all of their news and knowledge of politics from The Daily Show, SNL's Weekend Update, and Michael Moore movies.