Joint Chiefs Chair: ‘Open Borders and Immigration Issues’ Make ISIL ‘Immediate Threat’

(CNSNews.com) - Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon press briefing yesterday that “because of open borders and immigration issues,” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is an “immediate threat.”

In the context of this ISIL threat, Dempsey said he had had conversations with his European colleagues "about their southern flank." He did not specifically mention the U.S.-Mexico border, which is the southern flank of the United States.

Seven years ago, then-National Intelligence Director Mike McConnell publicly warned that terrorists were coming across the U.S.-Mexico border, and that "a significant number of Iraqis" had been "smuggled across illegally" the previous year.

"Now some we caught, some we didn't," McConnel told the El Paso Times inan interview published on Aug. 22, 2007. "The ones that get in, what are we going to do? They're going to write home. So, it's not rocket science, word will move around.

At yesterday's Defense Department briefing, a reporter asked Dempsey and Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel: “Is it the calculation, though, that ISIL presents a 9/11 level threat to the United States?”

“ISIL is as sophisticated and well-funded as any group that we have seen,” said Hagel. “They're beyond just a terrorist group. They marry ideology, a sophistication of strategic and tactical military prowess. They are tremendously well-funded.

“Oh, this is beyond anything that we've seen,” said Hagel. “So we must prepare for everything. And the only way you do that is that you take a cold, steely, hard look at it and get ready.”

Dempsey then added that the immediacy of the threat arose from non-Middle Easterners who had travelled to the area controlled by ISIL and who shared the group’s “ideology.”

“Well, the immediacy is in the number of Europeans and other nationalities who have come to the region to become part of that ideology,” said Dempsey. “And those folks can go home at some point. It's why I have conversations with my European colleagues about their southern flank of NATO, which I think is actually more threatened in the near term than we are.

“Nevertheless,” Dempsey continued, “because of open borders and immigration issues, it's an immediate threat. That is to say, the fighters who may leave the current fight and migrate home.

“Longer term, it's about ISIL's vision,” said Dempsey, “which includes -- I actually call ISIL, here we go, right, ISIS, I-S-I-S, because it's easier for me to remember that their long-term vision is the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham. And al-Sham includes Lebanon, the current state of Israel, Jordan, Iraq, Syria and Kuwait.

“If they were to achieve that vision, it would fundamentally alter the face of the Middle East and create a security environment that would certainly threaten us in many ways,” said Dempsey.

In the past, federal officials have publicly stated that terrorists have come across the U.S.-Mexico border into the United States.

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...open-borders-and-immigration-issues-make-isil
 
(CNSNews.com) - Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a Pentagon press briefing yesterday that “because of open borders and immigration issues,” the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is an “immediate threat.”

Of course... gotta be an IDIOT not to see that.

So, why do we have it? Either one or both of:

1. Odumbo is in a panic to secure the Hispanic vote for the DemoCraps and is willing to subject America to ANY risk to accomplish, or

2. Odumbo is really an Islamic terrorist.... doing all he can to harm America... and this border thing is a REALLY GREAT HARM!!
 
Bomb the shit out of them. What's so difficult?

A longer term plan should be to convert all Muslims away from this demonic faith. To do that, we must not just hit Iraq/Syria/ISIS but a blow to the heart of Islam. A shock and awe that will totally disabuse any notion of the omnipotence of Allah or Mohammed.

I suggest...

138082426410.jpg

1388601929371.jpg
 
The first step is identifying the enemy. Obama has been preoccupied with restarting the Cold War, no doubt because of Putin's anti-gay stance. He should have been focusing on the middle east,where his policies have created a disastrous destablizing domino effect.

ISIS is just a bunch of thugs, absent funding. The focus should be on their funding. Luckily, we know exactly where most of it comes from. Qatar, a gas rich gulf shiekdom is a leading funder of various terrorist groups, yet it is never mentioned . We treat them with kid gloves. Similarly, many private Kuwaitis show their gratitude for our rescuing them by funding these groups. Among rich arabs, it's kind of a competitive thing to see who can contribute the most to jihadi groups.

The first step to controlling these groups is to cut off their funding, but that will mean confronting the governments of Qatar, SA, Kuwait, etc. It's bad enough that we have a president with a deep affection for islam, so deep that he bows to the King of SA, who is kind of a muslim version of the Pope. Then there are the western companies that have business ties with these countries and which will oppose any steps that upset their patrons.

Their governments give lip service to controlling terrorist funding, but nothing ever actually happens. A couple of cruise missle hits into the Qatari gas plants would send a message that would be harder to ignore.
 
How Russia has dealt with this crap:
===============

Why Muslim Terrorists Don’t Kidnap Russians
Terrorists use terrorism because it works, although not against everybody. The Soviet Union’s flaws were without number, but the effete, obsequious squeamishness that characterizes the current American approach to Islam was not among them. From 1986:

The Jerusalem Post said the Soviet secret police last year secured the release of three kidnaped Soviet diplomats in Beirut by castrating a relative of a radical Lebanese Shia Muslim leader, sending him the severed organs and then shooting the relative in the head.

The incident began when four Soviet diplomats were kidnaped last September by Muslim extremists who demanded that Moscow pressure the Syrian government to stop pro-Syrian militiamen from shelling rival Muslim positions in the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli.

The militiamen, the Jerusalem paper said, did not cease their attacks, and the body of one of the Soviet diplomats, Arkady Katkov, was found a few days later in a field in Beirut.

The KGB then apparently kidnaped and killed a relative of an unnamed leader of the Shias’ Hezbollah (Party of God) group, a radical, pro-Iranian group that has been suspected of various terrorist activities against Western targets in Lebanon.

Parts of the man’s body, the paper said, were then sent to the Hezbollah leader with a warning that he would lose other relatives in a similar fashion if the three remaining Soviet diplomats were not immediately released. They were quickly freed.

The newspaper quoted “observers in Jerusalem” as saying: “This is the way the Soviets operate. They do things–they don’t talk. And this is the language Hezbollah understands.”

*from moonbattery.com
 
Back
Top