Quote from jay gould:
you became wealthy and he did not......
that certainly could be attributed to random distribution and risk taking behavior, no ?? furthermore, obviously, the market is random within certain parameters.
otherwise, great post. your opinion, please--- is it prerequisite to have large sums of capital to properly execute and profit from the "trend trading" strategies?
thanks.
JG
JG
Quote from jay gould:
Dr. Niederhoffer experienced a loss of aprox 50 million in 1997. I am not sure about 1987, or even if losses occured in this year.
respectfully,
JG
Quote from Maverick1:
I saw estimates of 50-100m for 1997. So it sounds like he blew up once only? I've heard people say 2 -3 times, 3 sounds wrong, but 2 sound correct, since I think I read somewhere that he did same thing in fall of 2001. Can anyone confirm?
How large is Matador now?
Quote from trade-ya1:
Hi all,
I think the difference between 'buy and hold' and trend following is that buy and hold simply implies no change at all to the core position. In other words, if one is truly following a buy and hold (or sell and hold) strategy, there should be no change to the position regarless of market conditions, change in trends, even fundamentals. Some 'long-term' investors have altered the 'buy and hold' strategy to mean, buy and hold unless fundamentals change. This is not truly buy and hold but, rather, buy and hold subject to changing conditions (which is obviously not really buy and hold). Trend following on the other hand implies that positions will be adjusted and even reversed based upon the direction of the trend. The determination of the time-frame of the trend is a matter of personal taste, risk tolerance and interpretation of the direction of the current trend in the context of your particular time-frame of choice. Best, Neal.
Quote from Maverick1:
From NYT 5/29/05'
"Returning to business hasn't been much easier for Victor Niederhoffer. His first hedge fund business was crippled in 1997 by leveraged and unhedged speculations in the Thai stock market, and then finished off by a wrong bet on American stocks.
Mr. Niederhoffer said he was severely depressed by the blow-up. To stay afloat, he had to sell his silver collection and take a mortgage on his 20,000-square-foot home in Weston, Conn. Friends ostracized him. "People stopped inviting me," he said. "I became persona non grata, and I think they were very disappointed in me. They thought of me as a winner and a prudent person. They had planned their retirement around their investments with me."
He did not get back in the game until 2002, when he founded the Matador Fund, an offshore hedge fund with $4 million. Today it has assets of $156 million, mostly, he said, from South Africa. "The economy is so bad there that our problems look minor in comparison," he said, alluding to his previous misfortunes.
The fund is up 147 percent since he founded it, including a 13 percent gain so far this year. The 2005 gain has come despite extraordinary volatility: for example, the fund lost 13 percent in just one month, April.
If such swings unnerve Mr. Niederhoffer, he doesn't show it. "There is always the possibility of failure on the front burner," he said. "You can't make money without risk. We believe we took appropriate risk."
Still, he knows that this may be his last chance. "People are willing to give you a second chance in America," he said. "I am still walking on very thin ice. And I am older. I am 61. I don't have the resilience to come back again."
Sounds like the dude still swinging big %s around, -13% in April and ytd +13% :eek:
Quote from jay gould:
i'll agree with this, neal. my contention is that "trend following" has a slim chance of working( when i say working--i mean resulting in worthwhile profits for the energy and capital extended) for the averaqe capitalized trader. But rather its a strategy for well capitalized traders who are able to diversify and withstand the inherent drawdowns. teaching this strategy as a primary method of trading to the average capitalized trader will result in a few winning traders, but the majority will be wiped out.
just my opinion, ofcourse.
best,
![]()
PS. kindly note, when i say "trend following" i am refering to commonly understood tactic of buying higher highs and higher lows and vice versa.
Quote from Maverick1:
Jay
It's one thing to warn people about the difficulty of trend following methods. I believe that you are right on in saying that capitalization is key and many people overlook that.
It is another thing (a big leap) to 1) claim that the larger and well capitalized trend followers who have been successful are purely lucky and in delusion, and 2) constantly put down JHenry's performance this year while selectively ignoring his longer term track record.
What part of JH has not blown up yet do you not get? Of course, you are absolutely entitled to your opinion that the successful trend followers are lucky and not skilled. But next time you cite a down month for JH, how about citing something quite similar from the non trend followers, like a -13% April return for VN, to keep things balanced?