Found this in a 12-year-old email -- no idea where I got it, but it is a solid presentation. (It's also a bit blurry; it's from an ancient xerox.)
While I'm not a huge fan of the MACD, I do think it holds a lot of merit -- especially for the longer term trades that I tend to avoid.
One of the things that Bollinger makes clear right from the start, is that the oft-cited 26|12|3 parameters hold absolutely no special value: he dives right into searching for look-backs that match the market being faced. And what is more[!] is that he develops a different set of look-backs for sells as opposed to buys -- this makes perfect sense to me, but I had never committed that to memory, I guess.
A good look at a good indicator, *without* anything smacking of faith or religion: just testable, repeatable observation.
While I'm not a huge fan of the MACD, I do think it holds a lot of merit -- especially for the longer term trades that I tend to avoid.
One of the things that Bollinger makes clear right from the start, is that the oft-cited 26|12|3 parameters hold absolutely no special value: he dives right into searching for look-backs that match the market being faced. And what is more[!] is that he develops a different set of look-backs for sells as opposed to buys -- this makes perfect sense to me, but I had never committed that to memory, I guess.
A good look at a good indicator, *without* anything smacking of faith or religion: just testable, repeatable observation.