Kernan is ok, as long as he sticks to the facts.His opinions are a totally different story.He has made several comments that has proven to me he is just a reporter,nothing more ,nothing less.Faber,Haines and Leisman, are far more credible.Fabers good with the technicles,Haines keeps the guests in line by putting them on the spot,and he doesnt pull punches.Leisman has hit on many of the problems with the economy,but cant seem to put all the pieces together. I cant even watch krudlow and crapper.By their own addmission,they've called the bottom 8 and 5 times respectively.Krudlow does not dwell in the world of reality.He used to be a Fed economist in the early 80s.However ,I dont knowif he left before or after Oct.87.Currently,he's involved in a fund of some sort.If you listen to Jim ,he owns half the stock that are discussed on the program.The rpogram is very one sided and practices little if any objectivity.On occasion I've wondered if they actually pay CNBC to air the show.