Migrants are not a foreign invasion. This is an asinine argument you’re making. Please stop.
Control of borders is not "domestic law enforcement."
That is asshatinine.
Migrants are not a foreign invasion. This is an asinine argument you’re making. Please stop.
that this bears repeating in 2021 is a testament as how far the cult of MAGA is gone.Migrants are not a foreign invasion. This is an asinine argument you’re making. Please stop.
that this bears repeating in 2021 is a testament as how far the cult of MAGA is gone.
Control of borders is not "domestic law enforcement."
That is asshatinine.
If it is obvious, how come Kamala is hiding under rock and avoiding the issue like the bubonic plague?
Oh, I see. She is finally going to the border for her one hit and run visit.
I wonder if that is related in any way to the fact that Trump announced that he is going to the border and her handlers do not want the optics of having Trump there while Kamala is off hiding.
Let the viewers decide.
Idiots.
Good. It is only proper that she go down and welcome the people she invited.
Put her in a cage for the weekend so that she can get some insight.
Even liberal LA Times calls Kamala Harris ineffective in her role as vice president
https://www.foxnews.com/media/la-times-kamala-ineffective-vice-president
The liberal Los Angeles Times said Vice President Kamala Harris has been ineffective in her role only five months after fawning over her so hard that the paper’s coverage was labeled "inappropriate and disappointing."
The L.A. paper was ridiculed on social media in January when it announced "Covering Kamala Harris," a project described as "a beat dedicated to her historic rise to the White House" that was loaded with complimentary content.
A piece published Wednesday by staff writer Noah Bierman headlined, "Essential Politics: Failure of elections bill shows limits of Kamala Harris’ influence," shows what a difference five months can make.
Bierman noted there was "justifiable skepticism" when President Biden selected Harris to lead an effort to expand voting rights.
"Fast forward three weeks, and Democrats are where many thought they would be: nowhere. The Senate killed the House-passed ‘For the People Act’ on Tuesday, with Democrats lacking the 60 votes to overcome a Republican filibuster," Bierman wrote. "As for Harris’ role, the takeaway was how little we saw of her. No dramatic trips to the Senate to court votes. No statements on how to find compromise. No known talks with West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, the sole Democratic holdout in supporting the bill."
The Times writer then took another shot at Harris, noting "her lack of any significant engagement in the Senate has not been a surprise" to anyone who has paid attention to her political career.
"She served only four years there, a good portion of that time running for president. Her best-known interaction with Manchin involved angering him, when she went on television in his home state earlier this year to push for an economic relief bill, and he publicly complained she hadn’t given him a heads-up," Bierman wrote.
Bierman mentioned Harris seems to be "working on her Senate relationships" after hosting a bipartisan dinner, but he feels she lacks "influence when it comes to legislating in the modern Congress."
(More at above url)
I don’t know if the voter bill failure is her fault but she is doing a pretty piss poor job overall. She needs to get tougher and become more aware of her image.
Even liberal LA Times calls Kamala Harris ineffective in her role as vice president
https://www.foxnews.com/media/la-times-kamala-ineffective-vice-president
The liberal Los Angeles Times said Vice President Kamala Harris has been ineffective in her role only five months after fawning over her so hard that the paper’s coverage was labeled "inappropriate and disappointing."
The L.A. paper was ridiculed on social media in January when it announced "Covering Kamala Harris," a project described as "a beat dedicated to her historic rise to the White House" that was loaded with complimentary content.
A piece published Wednesday by staff writer Noah Bierman headlined, "Essential Politics: Failure of elections bill shows limits of Kamala Harris’ influence," shows what a difference five months can make.
Bierman noted there was "justifiable skepticism" when President Biden selected Harris to lead an effort to expand voting rights.
"Fast forward three weeks, and Democrats are where many thought they would be: nowhere. The Senate killed the House-passed ‘For the People Act’ on Tuesday, with Democrats lacking the 60 votes to overcome a Republican filibuster," Bierman wrote. "As for Harris’ role, the takeaway was how little we saw of her. No dramatic trips to the Senate to court votes. No statements on how to find compromise. No known talks with West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin, the sole Democratic holdout in supporting the bill."
The Times writer then took another shot at Harris, noting "her lack of any significant engagement in the Senate has not been a surprise" to anyone who has paid attention to her political career.
"She served only four years there, a good portion of that time running for president. Her best-known interaction with Manchin involved angering him, when she went on television in his home state earlier this year to push for an economic relief bill, and he publicly complained she hadn’t given him a heads-up," Bierman wrote.
Bierman mentioned Harris seems to be "working on her Senate relationships" after hosting a bipartisan dinner, but he feels she lacks "influence when it comes to legislating in the modern Congress."
(More at above url)