Joe Biden - The Fake President

elderado said:
Fake charity to go with fake lying racist.

Joe Biden’s cancer charity spent more than $3.7million on staff salaries but distributed ZERO towards research grants over two years, tax filings reveal

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-charity-spent-3-7million-staff-salaries.html
More...


Perhaps we have underestimated Joe.

Usually the Big Guy gets 10, but there seems to be numerous examples around and about wherein the Big Guy gets 100%. Exhibit A above.

Wow. Wayyy to go Joe. When it comes to Hunter, the apple does not fall far from the tree, eh?
 
Nine_Ender said:
Some of the professors at Trump's school remember him as generally clueless perhaps the dumbest student they ever had. I'm sure TreeFrogTrader's high school teachers say the same thing about him. Too many kids get pushed through school getting a pass when they should have failed; he's no doubt one of them.
More...
This is why I've said hundreds of times ...

The problem is the educational system.

You've mention one issue, pushing unqualified students through the system. Another is unqualified teachers. There are many more.

Until education is improved, things will only get worse, not better.
 
userque said:
It's not a difficult concept, as I'm sure you know. But here, let me help you.

Initial things stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Initial umpire calls stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Initial court rulings stand, until overturned. Initiating an appeal doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Election results stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Innocent until, proven guilty. Indicting doesn't, in and of itself, mean guilt.

So, yeah, Biden is POTUS-elect, unless and until that determination is overturned by a court.
More...

Do you believe the Trump Administration is not going to court? Do you believe if a lower court rules against the Trump Administration it is impossible for them to appeal to a higher court, even all the way to the Supreme Court?

The Trump Administration has substantial basis to believe the election results did not reflect the adherence of our election process. Electronic based election fraud is indicated by several means and by several sources listed throughout various threads. I know you have seen them, but whether you read them may be another story.

Perhaps you may feel if you try to minimize the ample indications of election fraud, it will go away. The indications of election fraud will not go away all appeals are exhausted and the Supreme Court rules against the Trump Administration. Even a Trump concession would not necessarily mean there was no election fraud.
 
BeautifulStranger said:
Do you believe the Trump Administration is not going to court? Do you believe if a lower court rules against the Trump Administration it is impossible for them to appeal to a higher court, even all the way to the Supreme Court?

The Trump Administration has substantial basis to believe the election results did not reflect the adherence of our election process. Electronic based election fraud is indicated by several means and by several sources listed throughout various threads. I know you have seen them, but whether you read them may be another story.

Perhaps you may feel if you try to minimize the ample indications of election fraud, it will go away. The indications of election fraud will not go away all appeals are exhausted and the Supreme Court rules against the Trump Administration. Even a Trump concession would not necessarily mean there was no election fraud.
More...
What part of your post addresses what I said:

userque said:
It's not a difficult concept, as I'm sure you know. But here, let me help you.

Initial things stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Initial umpire calls stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Initial court rulings stand, until overturned. Initiating an appeal doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Election results stand, until overturned. Initiating a challenge doesn't, in and of itself, change the status.

Innocent until, proven guilty. Indicting doesn't, in and of itself, mean guilt.

So, yeah, Biden is POTUS-elect, unless and until that determination is overturned by a court.
More...
 
hought people voted for Biden beacause he is
Here4money said:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/danale...rity-money-into-his-business/?sh=1a62f1736b4a
How Donald Trump Shifted Kids-Cancer Charity Money Into His Business

and it ain't no fucking dailymail
More...
Another " but Trump did it to"
I thought Biden was the one with morals and better behavior yet you don't deny Biden did mess with the charity and instead stated Trump has done the same
I don't understand why so many Leftists resort to "well Trump did it to". If they are both doing it then they are equally immoral
 
@BeautifulStranger

Waffling all over the place, with long-winded off topic responses doesn't confuse everyone.

As you should recall from our last discussion you walked away from, I'm not easily baffled with your avoidance and obfuscation tactics; nor your bullshit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top