JMA opinions

headcutter · Sep 15, 2003

What do you think about JMA:
http://www.jurikres.com/down/product_guide_.pdf

Anyway what MA are you mainly using and do you think some MA are better for forex market then others.

saschabr · Sep 15, 2003

I do not think anyone will urgently need the JMA.
The T3 is a good alternative as well.
In any way, it is only a moving average, my opinion is,
if you are unprofitable without the JMA, you will be
unprofitable with the JMA as well.

Also, the samples on jurikres seem a little bit exaggerated
to me. You will not realize a dramatic difference to other
(free) smoothers in reality.

just21 · Sep 15, 2003

What are the most profitable ways to use moving averages? I like the reversal at the 20 period back in the direction of the trend when adx is greater than 30. What ways do people look at moving averages?

headcutter · Sep 15, 2003

what exacly is the T3? anywhere to read about it?

saschabr · Sep 15, 2003

use google to find out more about the triple exponential
moving average

headcutter · Sep 15, 2003

ohh ok thanks it is the triple exponential

vanilla2 · Sep 15, 2003

here's the T3. It's good.

http://trader.online.pl/ELZ/t-i-T3.html

nitro · Sep 24, 2003

When you look at the T3's frequency response, you will see that the default damping coefficient is too high, resulting in amplification at low frequencies. This may have been fixed in recent versions...

Jurik's JMA does not have this problem.

nitro

Quote from saschabr:

I do not think anyone will urgently need the JMA.
The T3 is a good alternative as well.
In any way, it is only a moving average, my opinion is,
if you are unprofitable without the JMA, you will be
unprofitable with the JMA as well.

Also, the samples on jurikres seem a little bit exaggerated
to me. You will not realize a dramatic difference to other
(free) smoothers in reality.