Jindal: GOP Needs to Stop Saying 'Stupid Things'

Quote from Mercor:

Do you have any opinion about what policies Obama should do?
What should he do about Isreal?
What about Myanmar? Why go there?

What a waste of time bringing up old speculations about elections.

Next are you going to move the the trading section and pull up unsuccessful trades.

Time for you to move on.

Sure, Obama, now that he does not need to keep his base, needs to veer hard towards the fiscal right.

Since I am now aware that we created that state, I guess we have to see it thru. Kinda like a love child, you really don't want it, but whattayougonnado?

Burma is veering towards democracy, we need to support that so that other regions may follow suit.
 
Quote from Mercor:

With 400,000 key votes out of 110 million switching, Romney would have won.
Anyone who thought they knew who was going to win is fooled by randomness. Something only traders are aware of.

lol, even randomness has some tells. Take a chart, a hammer on rising volume is a good bet, especially if you have divergence on a momo oscillator.


Take the election, an Obama win was a good bet. And do you know why? He was painted early as a one percenter, and there was no getting away from that. After Clinton gave that devastating DNC nomination speech, it was all over. They even knew it here on ET if you wish to dig up the threads on that day.
 
Quote from Mercor:

...Anyone who thought they knew who was going to win is fooled by randomness.


Something only traders are aware of.

Quote from AK Forty Seven:

I'm not a trader...
 
Quote from RCG Trader:

lol, even randomness has some tells. Take a chart, a hammer on rising volume is a good bet, especially if you have divergence on a momo oscillator.


Take the election, an Obama win was a good bet. And do you know why? He was painted early as a one percenter, and there was no getting away from that. After Clinton gave that devastating DNC nomination speech, it was all over. They even knew it here on ET if you wish to dig up the threads on that day.
You're kinda making my point.
Either there is randomness or there is bias. You seek bias.
 
Quote from Mercor:

With 400,000 key votes out of 110 million switching, Romney would have won.

Same could said about many presidential elections.Bush would have lost both his elections with a smaller switch then that but if that makes you feel better more power to you
 
Quote from Mercor:

You're kinda making my point.
Either there is randomness or there is bias. You seek bias.

There is bias in randomness at specific points. It works in both trading and politics.
 
Quote from Mercor:

You're kinda making my point.
Either there is randomness or there is bias. You seek bias.

Incumbents winning 70 % of the time,no incumbent ever losing re election during a time of war,Obama having no primary challenger like Carter did,Obama having no third party spoiler like Bush 1 etc provided a bias Merc
 
Back
Top