Yet something going up or down can also be modeled after geometric brownian motion, which is no better than zero-expected-value gambling (before execution costs) -- in other words, completely worthless as a trading or investing tool.
Again, I am not saying that "trend following" is worthless, but the fact that hardly anyone (if anyone at all) on planet Earth was able to time (even in a very rough sense) the four trades implied by your examples demonstrates that if there is a "trend" to follow as an anticipatory signal, it is by no means easy to do.
"Trends" look seductively obvious in hindsight to the human brain. Whether they enable you to earn money trading is an almost entirely separate issue.