Jim Cramer discusses the Fed on Mad Money.

Quote from dinoman:

I am sorry to say this , but this is another dumbass statement!

Why don't you actually do some reasearch to find out why you posted such a lament response!


lament?

I lament that I am responding to this ... If you want to argue with me, why don't you support your point 'this is another dumbass statement'? You need to give me something to work with.
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

lament?

I lament that I am responding to this ... If you want to argue with me, why don't you support your point 'this is another dumbass statement'? You need to give me something to work with.

First start by looking up the definition of "lament"

Then try to provide facts with your statement then we will go from there.


It wasn't my point to argue just so you know.

How about I start you off with a clue. Who do you think faciliated "Wall Street" with this scenario?
 
Quote from dinoman:

First start by looking up the definition of "lament"

Then try to provide facts with your statement then we will go from there.


It wasn't my point to argue just so you know.

ok. this is all in good fun for me. but you used the word lament in front of the word response as an adjective. Its not an adjective.

Lament is a noun or a verb ... So you basically didn't make sense to me.. I thought you meant to type 'lame' ...

And I don't need to look up lament... although i did search for an adjective and couldn't find it.
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

My point, though, is that the inflation we are seeing today is not purely a result of FOMC policy. It is global equalization/modernization and demand for key resources. And our lack of a winning strategy to solve the crude problem -ahead of time- is probably a bigger cause of dollar devaluation than FOMC's temporary loose $$$ policy (and by the way, I DO remember the worries of deflation ... in a recession the 'better safe than sorry' policy was probably a good move though. that doesn't make it OK however how long they kept rates that low, though).

I don't think you have an understanding of what inflation is. Or deflation for that matter. Or exactly how central banks work and exactly why Ron Paul wants to abolish it.

Supply/demand & inflation/deflation are not the same thing.
 
Quote from scriabinop23:

ok. this is all in good fun for me. but you used the word lament in front of the word response as an adjective. Its not an adjective.

Lament is a noun or a verb ... So you basically didn't make sense to me.. I thought you meant to type 'lame' ...

And I don't need to look up lament... although i did search for an adjective and couldn't find it.

If that is your answer then so be it. Last time I checked we were'nt running an English class here.

I will give you the fact that my english is not the best. You win 100% there. If your trying to discredit me based on that then you are right.

If you actually want to prove your statement with facts then I will leave that up to you.
 
Quote from Hydroblunt:

I don't think you have an understand of what inflation is. Or deflation for that matter. Or exactly how central banks work and exactly why Ron Paul wants to abolish it.

Supply/demand & inflation/deflation are not the same thing. Most people cannot figure this out.


Someone understands where I am heading. Nice!
 
Quote from scarylarry:

That was a dumb's post or did u say dumb posts?

How about "you dumbfuck? do you u-n-d-e-r-s-t-a-n-d ?

LOL. I was trying to be nice.
 
Back
Top