Quote from vhehn:
we dont yet know exactly how we came but we do know it was not the way the bible writers claimed. that we can test. evolution is observable through the traces it left.
The notion that faith in Christ is to be rewarded by an eternity of bliss, while a dependence upon reason, observation and experience merits everlasting pain, is too absurd for refutation, and can be relieved only by that unhappy mixture of insanity and ignorance, called "faith."
-- Robert Green Ingersoll
Sir, your logic contained in your above statement, seems deficient........
We don't know whence we came, but we are sure it's not how you think we did !!!
The statements or confessions of faith that I read on your referenced link, were , in my opinion, a faith of negativity...the sole dogmatic doctrine is the refutation of others' belief in a power and majesty beyond themselves.....
Contrast the statement of Ingersoll that you included, with the statement of Barth, on creation:
".....Our first emphasis is on this final point that the doctrine of the creation no less than the whole remaining content of Christian confession is an article of faith, i.e., the rendering of a knowledge which no man has procured for himself or ever will; which is neither native to him nor accessible by way of observation and logical thinking; for which he has no organ and no ability; which he can in fact achieve only in faith; but which is actually consummated in faith, i.e., in the reception of and response to the divine witness, so that he is made to be strong in his weakness, to see in his blindness and to hear in his deafness by the One who, according to the Easter story, goes through closed doors. It is a faith and doctrine of this kind which is expressed when in and with the whole of Christendom we confess that God is the Creator of heaven and earth...."
The hate and disdain contained in Ingersolls' credo seems to be missing from that of the great theologian and doctor of Christendom, Karl Barth.