Jeanine Pirro is off the air at Fox News

[Cuddles]

From your citation:In 2008 Omar and Hirsi reached an “impasse” in their relationship and separated (again under Muslim custom). In 2009, Omar engaged in a civil marriage with Ahmed Nur Said Elmi, a British citizen, but they separated in 2011 (without obtaining a legal divorce), and Elmi returned to England.

I'm a little rusty on my Sharia Law but the fact that she had a civil marriage in the US means she married her brother. If it wasn't for an immigration scheme, then it's even more disgusting.

I give two goat fuuks about Muslim custom.

Also from that post:
We found no public records or credible sources contradicting Omar’s account of her past, nor any substantive evidence corroborating claims that Elmi is her brother or that their marriage was otherwise fraudulent. In addition, some of the claims offered in support of the rumor don’t seem to add up.

You should've stayed in school.

 

[Cuddles]

The word Democrat comes from the word Demotic which comes from the proto-indo-european word da-mo which means "to divide"

Democrat literally means the division of people.

A cursory google search proves you're full of shit
https://www.google.com/search?ei=E6...0i67j0i131j0i10i67j0i10j0j0i22i30.gfMmqexIang

https://www.etymonline.com/word/democracy

democracy (n.)
"government by the people, system of government in which the sovereign power is vested in the people as a whole exercising power directly or by elected officials; a state so governed," 1570s, from Middle French démocratie (14c.), from Medieval Latin democratia (13c.), from Greek dēmokratia "popular government," from dēmos "common people," originally "district" (see demotic), + kratos "rule, strength" (see -cracy).

Sometimes 16c.-17c. in Latinized form democratie. In 19c. England it could refer to "the class of people which has no hereditary or other rank, the common people." In 19c. U.S. politics it could mean "principles or members of the Democratic Party."



Democracy implies that the man must take the responsibility for choosing his rulers and representatives, and for the maintenance of his own 'rights' against the possible and probable encroachments of the government which he has sanctioned to act for him in public matters. [Ezra Pound, "ABC of Economics," 1933]

 

[CaptainObvious]

So Ms. Pirro dared to challenge our new favorite radical Islamist. That's a big no no. Omar should be stripped of her committee membership and be put on notice that if she continues down the path of radical Islamic beliefs she will be expelled from Congress, deported back to the shithole she came from and put at the top of a terrorist threat list. Never going to happen in cuck world, but one can dream.

 

[Cuddles]

So Ms. Pirro dared to challenge our new favorite radical Islamist. That's a big no no. Omar should be stripped of her committee membership and be put on notice that if she continues down the path of radical Islamic beliefs she will be expelled from Congress, deported back to the shithole she came from and put at the top of a terrorist threat list. Never going to happen in cuck world, but one can dream.

So you're against the 1st amendment? How very fascist

 

[AAAintheBeltway]

Pirro is facing criticism after appearing to suggest on her program last Saturday that Omar wears a hijab in defiance of the Constitution. “Think about this: She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat Party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from?” Pirro asked during her opening segment. “Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...-fox-saturday-after-remarks-about-ilhan-omar/

Interesting. The list of things we are not allowed to discuss is getting mighty long.

 

[Cuddles]

Pirro is facing criticism after appearing to suggest on her program last Saturday that Omar wears a hijab in defiance of the Constitution. “Think about this: She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat Party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from?” Pirro asked during her opening segment. “Think about it. Omar wears a hijab, which according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?” https://www.breitbart.com/the-media...-fox-saturday-after-remarks-about-ilhan-omar/

Interesting. The list of things we are not allowed to discuss is getting mighty long.

She can discuss it all she wants and get dismissed at the breadline as a kooky old bat. Just don't expect to stay employed or sponsored when doing so.

 

[CaptainObvious]

So you're against the 1st amendment? How very fascist

I thought it had already been established that "hate speech" isn't covered by the first amendment, and hate speech is oh so nuanced these days isn't it? One persons simple opinion of things is anothers hateful rhetoric. And who is to make the distinction, the leftist ministry of truth?

 

[CaptainObvious]

She can discuss it all she wants and get dismissed at the breadline as a kooky old bat. Just don't expect to stay employed or sponsored when doing so.

I tend to agree and if standards are to be equally applied Omar should be in that very same breadline.

 

[Cuddles]

I thought it had already been established that "hate speech" isn't covered by the first amendment, and hate speech is oh so nuanced these days isn't it? One persons simple opinion of things is anothers hateful rhetoric. And who is to make the distinction, the leftist ministry of truth?

Hate speech is protected speech. Which is why you don't hear lefties asking kkk'ers to be shipped out as you propose

 

[DTB2]

Also from that post:
We found no public records or credible sources contradicting Omar’s account of her past, nor any substantive evidence corroborating claims that Elmi is her brother or that their marriage was otherwise fraudulent. In addition, some of the claims offered in support of the rumor don’t seem to add up.

You should've stayed in school.

You may be satisfied with responses like "“For someone like me, who left a war-torn country at the age of 8, who got refugee status to come to America, where in the world am I finding a sibling 15 years, 20 years later to seek to do what people accuse me of?” Omar said."

Yeah, people didn't reunite after WWII. Oh wait they did, my bad.

Or these little nuggets


"Why did Omar’s 2016 campaign literature reference Ahmed Hirsi as her “husband” when she hadn’t yet divorced Ahmed Elmi or married Hirsi? Why did Omar say in her 2017 divorce filing that she’d had no contact with Elmi since June of 2011 when she was seemingly photographed with him in London in 2015? Why has Elmi not put the matter to rest by coming forward and explaining the nature of his relationship with Omar?"

She's shady as fuuk.