Obviously you're in a rut (many get in one..., from time to time.., which is why they claim draw downs are inevitable)
I'm sorry to bud in here jas, but I found this comment very interesting and wanted to reply.
I have always been trying to figure out what this drawdown means when people say they have it. If you are an EOD trader, and perhaps only put on one or two trades a week, then it makes total sense how a string of consecutive failed trades in a row might give you a drawdown, especially if lets say each trade risks 2-3% of your account. You might have a few losing trades, a couple of winning trades, and then some more losing trades. In other words, getting 8 out of 10 failed trades in a string might be something you need to prepare for, and if that % risked per trade is 2-3%, then you might be down 25% or so in your account.
But how a day trader, who has perhaps 5 to 10 trades in a day can suffer a drawdown like this I don't understand. He can just as likely have a string of losses in a row, but I imagine the r:r ratio more than likely heavily favors the reward side (thereby making a positive day even if the win ratio is small), and even if a bad day happens once a week, or perhaps twice, a losing week should be extremely rare, and a losing month almost impossible.
Of course losing months do happen, as you elude to, but I am of the opinion that this would therefore point to a trading plan that does not account for different market conditions, or the inability to follow the plan or identify which parts of the plan should be used (ie. favoring long or shorts depending on bull or bear market, and knowing if the market is trending or ranging and hence enacting the appropriate part of the plan). It could of course also be that the plan isn't so much about following price, more purely stats based, and hence not nearly as robust to deal with ever changing market conditions.
Do you think I am on the right track with my conclusions and is this what I think you mean to imply with your comment?