Jared Kushner a 'focus' in Russia probe

[Good1]

So how, again, are you saying the Russians hacked US elections?

By swinging an unknown number of votes, with an unknown number of broken English speaking trolls, which had an unknown amount of influence compared to the head of the FBI, the Wikileaks, and Trump's rhetoric?

You don't have to answer that if you don't speculate on the amount of Russian influence compared to American influence.

But wait. If there was 1000 Russian trolls, is that disqualifying of Trump's election? Was it illegal, for them, or for Trump?

Why should it be an EITHER OR question? All of those things had an effect with the Comey letter doing the most damage as it came so late in the election.

 

[Good1]

Wait. So your saying Trump may have told Putin to enlist 1000 trolls to get on American social media and influence the election?

And you are implying that trolling is not illegal, but asking Russians to troll does disqualify Trump?

So how does anyone, who testifies in a Senate hearing, know there were 1000 Russian trolls trolling?

I am citing from the Senate testimony, if you have a problem with facts then complain to them.

And who knows what Trump told the Russians, he is clearly very agitated about it.

 

[exGOPer]

His D

His DOJ hasn't prosecuted Arapio's evidence for the same political reasons Trump came out, before the election, and stated Obama was born in the US.

He does not know, but has committed to knowing, possibly based on some things he has heard more recently. Still, neither he, nor Obama, can prove where he was born. We only know t he SHOWN BC is forged.

I don't claim to know, like you.

I claim that neither you or I can know at this moment, and at this moment we can know the SHOWN BC is forged.

What political reasons? If truth was on his side then what political reasons could it be? Trump also said that his Hawaiian PIs are finding 'amazing things', if they were amazing things then why hasn't he disclosed it yet? Could it be that he was lying as usual?

And who is this 'we', where is your analysis?

 

[exGOPer]

Wait. So your saying Trump may have told Putin to enlist 1000 trolls to get on American social media and influence the election?

And you are implying that trolling is not illegal, but asking Russians to troll does disqualify Trump?

So how does anyone, who testifies in a Senate hearing, know there were 1000 Russian trolls trolling?

Who knows what he said given they were busy asking for secret communications.

The trolls left digital footprints for intelligence agencies to track, that's how we know they are Russian.

 

[exGOPer]

So how, again, are you saying the Russians hacked US elections?

By swinging an unknown number of votes, with an unknown number of broken English speaking trolls, which had an unknown amount of influence compared to the head of the FBI, the Wikileaks, and Trump's rhetoric?

You don't have to answer that if you don't speculate on the amount of Russian influence compared to American influence.

But wait. If there was 1000 Russian trolls, is that disqualifying of Trump's election? Was it illegal, for them, or for Trump?

Yes

 

[Good1]

Your changing

Who knows what he said given they were busy asking for secret communications.

The trolls left digital footprints for intelligence agencies to track, that's how we know they are Russian.

You're story is changing as you are backed into a corner.

You are conflating social media trolls with actual hackers.

So were there now 1000 hackers leaving Russian footprints?

And are you saying these hackers are stupid enough to leave footprints, while our own national hackers are smart enough to leave Russian footprints too?

Oh, and where did they leave these footprints?

On a server no national investigative body, not connected to a political party, has seen?

If we can't find those footprints, you can change your story back to 1000 social media trolls.

 

[piezoe]

Then if that is the main investgation, they are using the cover of Russian electoral influence as the justification. The justification, for public consumption, came first, the private investigation came second.

This did not start out as a Russian blackmail investigation. Not publicly.

It morphed into this, pushed by the same people who pushed the Russian election "hack" in our faces and down our throats.

Are you saying that since the Russia-hacked-our-election meme is losing traction, the Russia-is-blackmailing-our-president is now the main investigation?

Many were not as aware of the financial transaction investigation, because the popular media didn't start focusing on it until recently. It has always been there. Those who read widely outside of the popular media were aware of it but very little detail has come to light. Nevertheless, anyone with the least analytical mind would have noticed the vanishingly small probability by mere chance of any U.S. president having so many close associates with more than casual connections to Russia. Russian business practice is known to be incredibly non-transparent and corrupt.

 

[Good1]

So you

Many were not as aware of the financial transaction investigation, because the popular media didn't start focusing on it until recently. It has always been there. Those who read widely outside of the popular media were aware of it but very little detail has come to light. Nevertheless, anyone with the least analytical mind would have noticed the vanishingly small probability by mere chance of any U.S. president having so many close associates with more than casual connections to Russia. Russian business practice is known to be incredibly non-transparent and corrupt.

So you're saying this is pre election vetting that is being carried on, post election, in the name of Hey-the-Russians-stole-our-election?

 

[exGOPer]

Your changing


You're story is changing as you are backed into a corner.

You are conflating social media trolls with actual hackers.

So were there now 1000 hackers leaving Russian footprints?

And are you saying these hackers are stupid enough to leave footprints, while our own national hackers are smart enough to leave Russian footprints too?

Oh, and where did they leave these footprints?

On a server no national investigative body, not connected to a political party, has seen?

If we can't find those footprints, you can change your story back to 1000 social media trolls.

Again - there were MULTIPLE efforts to affect the outcome, it's not my fault that you have a simple narrative and are unable to track multiple events

 

[Good1]

Oh, so the Russians hacked servers, left footprints, AND trolled social media with broken English, trying to convince Americans to vote for Trump?

So, how many hackers, and how many trollers were there?

Maybe there was 400 hackers, and 600 trollers. I'm not sure, is that a brigade?

Also don't forget the 100 Russian phishers who got John Podesta to give up a password.

I am unable to keep track of so many lies. I don't know how you multitask like that.

Again - there were MULTIPLE efforts to affect the outcome, it's not my fault that you have a simple narrative and are unable to track multiple events