Jared Kushner a 'focus' in Russia probe

[Good1]

So it's possible he was fathered by US citizen, albeit Communist, either in Hawaii, Kenya, or Seattle. The pregnancy could have started in any of those places, and ended in another. Whomever the father was, it was a liaison, and possibly unsure, even to the mother. At some point, Barry/Barack committed to the Kenyan narrative when he was old enough to play politics...or old enough to apply for US college as foreign student.

So, it's possible the deep state, and third party cronies, helped him put his history in a black hole because they were satisfied he was US citizen, even if born in Kenya. If Marshall was the father, that would be probable, especially getting help from the deep state,on the far left.

Still, the publicized document is forged, and he did claim Kenyan birth in a document early in his political career.

At some point, Obama acknowledged ties to Frank Marshall, but in a way that would be politically expedient. By acknowledging ties to Marshall, he could call out to the left for help, while keeping political distance from a past where being Communist was politically inexpedient, and frowned upon. Now, Bernie Sanders brand is popular, but that popularity dates back to at least the time Barack felt it was expedient to acknowledge the influence of Marshall.

At a correspondence dinner, Obama joked with Sanders, asking why his "comrade" was keeping his distance from him.

The point is Obama understands political positions, and the need for "distance", including his distance from his Mohammedan faith.

When it was expedient, he brought a Kenyan "father" close, and kept Marshall close, but distant.

When the Kenyan birth narrative was no longer expedient, that part was changed, but it was TOO LATE to change the Kenyan father narrative.

 

[Good1]

I don't do arbitrary scaling


So first he changed his birth certificate from US born to Kenyan born and then back again because of a devious long term plan to capitalize on the great Kenyan influence on political careers.

That totally makes sense.

Presumably, his original certificate would say Barack Obama. But we know he was called Barry Soetoro in Indonesia, taking the name of his mother's then liaison, if not new husband.

So to answer your question, why would he change his name from Barack Obama, to Barry Soetoro, back to Barack Obama again?

Doesn't make sense, especially as Barack has never acknowledged a name change.

If it was Barack originally, then it was changed twice. Otherwise, once.

Of course, Barry could have been a nickname, and Soetoro could have been a courtesy to his mother's liaison, or possibly husband in law.

But there is evidence Barry was more than a nickname.

 

[Arnie]

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-comey-letter-probably-cost-clinton-the-election/

Where's your Kenya analysis?

If she got 3 million more votes, how can you say the Comey letter cost her the election?
She lost states she should have won, but didn't because she ran a campaign with no message.
"Stronger Together"? WTF does that MEAN?
Say what you want about Trump, his message was crystal clear. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. And it obviously resonated with the voters that mattered.

 

[piezoe]

I'd love it if they found something on Kushner. But they won't. Again.

I think he is likely involved only in a relatively innocent, peripheral way, despite the uncomplimentary rumors. That is to say he probably was exploring legitimate re-financing opportunities for 666* Fifth Avenue at the recommendation of his father-in-law.

His father in law, the one with the Narcissism, is in big trouble. Something he has done involving financial transactions and Russians is illegal under U.S. law. And this is why you are not entitled to see his tax returns. This could be anything from money laundering to under reporting capital gains, where it would be easy for him to say 'Ooops, I should have reported that', but very difficult to be believed as having made an innocent mistake. The Russians, unfortunately for Trump, know exactly what he has done that is illegal under U.S. law, and that is why he is so disgustingly obsequious toward Russians and their interests. It is subtle blackmail!

This raises an obvious question, why would anyone in their right mind get themselves in such a jam by running for President of the United States, even if there wasn't a snowball's chance in hell of being elected. Answer: they wouldn't; only an incurable narcissist, i.e., 'showboater', would do such a thing. We all know Trump well enough by now to know that when the illegal activity is finally outed, it won't be Trump's fault. It will be the fault of someone who is 'a very bad accountant or tax attorney' and needs to be fired 'for not doing a good job'. Until that moment, his problems are going to be the fault of the 'lying, very bad U.S. press' (these are 'horrible people') for making up stories when there is nothing there.

____________________
*Has anyone bedsides myself, noticed the ironic nature of this swanky address?

 

[jem]

had people made similar theories with far more evidence against obama you all would have been making tin foil hat gifs and giving each other likes.

but although I know you have no evidence... it is plausible.

I think he is likely involved only in a relatively innocent, peripheral way, despite the uncomplimentary rumors. That is to say he probably was exploring legitimate re-financing opportunities for 666* Fifth Avenue at the recommendation of his father-in-law.

His father in law, the one with the Narcissism, is in big trouble. Something he has done involving financial transactions and Russians is illegal under U.S. law. And this is why you are not entitled to see his tax returns. This could be anything from money laundering to under reporting capital gains, where it would be easy for him to say 'Ooops, I should have reported that', but very difficult to be believed as having made an innocent mistake. The Russians, unfortunately for Trump, know exactly what he has done that is illegal under U.S. law, and that is why he is so disgustingly obsequious toward Russians and their interests. It is subtle blackmail!

This raises an obvious question, why would anyone in their right mind get themselves in such a jam by running for President of the United States, even if there wasn't a snowball's chance in hell of being elected. Answer: they wouldn't; only an incurable narcissist, i.e., 'showboater', would do such a thing. We all know Trump well enough by now to know that when the illegal activity is finally outed, it won't be Trump's fault. It will be the fault of someone who is 'a very bad accountant or tax attorney' and needs to be fired 'for not doing a good job'. Until that moment, his problems are going to be the fault of the 'lying, very bad U.S. press' (these are 'horrible people') for making up stories when there is nothing there.

____________________
*Has anyone bedsides myself, noticed the ironic nature of this swanky address?

 

[Cuddles]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/worl...0a14b4-422d-11e7-9869-bac8b446820a_story.html

 

[Covertibility]

Add this to the WaPo story posted above:


Russian Once Tied to Trump Aide Seeks Immunity to Testify Before Congress

 

[piezoe]

although I know you have no evidence... it is plausible.

It is more then plausible. The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming! Keeping Ockham's razor in mind, Trumps bizarre, obsequious behavior toward Russian operatives, which runs entirely counter to his nature, can only be explained if he is bat shit crazy, or he has done something Russians know about that is illegal under U.S. law, or both. It is highly likely to have been a real estate, or related financial transaction that they are holding over his head like the Sword of Damocles. They may have facilitated an illegal transaction with the intention of entrapping him and making him their pawn. The handwriting is all over the wall. It's inescapable. If this is obvious to people like ourselves, then we can be certain that everyone in Washington is talking about this. It is going to be entertaining as hell going forward.

 

[Covertibility]

As much as Dems wants to believe what's written above ^ , odds are Trump walks. I think all the inquiries are from the Establishment (E) to get the Trumps firmly on the E agenda -- meaning no more talk about a wall, no changes to NAFTA, no bombing North Korea, etc..

 

[Good1]

It is more then plausible. The circumstantial evidence is overwhelming! Keeping Ockham's razor in mind, Trumps bizarre, obsequious behavior toward Russian operatives, which runs entirely counter to his nature, can only be explained if he is bat shit crazy, or he has done something Russians know about that is illegal under U.S. law, or both. It is highly likely to have been a real estate, or related financial transaction that they are holding over his head like the Sword of Damocles. They may have facilitated an illegal transaction with the intention of entrapping him and making him their pawn. The handwriting is all over the wall. It's inescapable. If this is obvious to people like ourselves, then we can be certain that everyone in Washington is talking about this. It is going to be entertaining as hell going forward.

Just a reminder, the effort to pin some, ANY Russian connection on Trump, goes way beyond the initial charge, that the Russian's hacked the U.S. elections. This is a completely new charge, a completely other issue. We are now being told the Russian's hacked the election, AND are in a position to blackmail the U.S. president, AND are probably blackmailing the U.S. president.

You are watching way too much Colbert at night.