Japan has fallen victim to the Keynesian scam

In case you have not noticed, American rating agencies outside of the US have become all but meaningless. Recent Examples: China, Brazil, Russia, Europe, now Japan. So this downgrade has no bearing at all on judging how successful or not Abenomics is.

The issue in Japan is still on structural reforms that are not forthcoming by the way.

Did someone say it's the end of Japan or did someone just show yet another example of how Abenomics is a disaster in the making?

Oh wait, sorry. It was you who said it was the end of Japan.
 
Congratulations! I would have thought no one could have a worse understanding of U.S. macro economics and monetary policy than you. Nevertheless, you achieved the seemingly impossible. By demonstrating an even worse understanding of Japanese macro economics and monetary policy you have now surpassed even yourself.

At least you countered my comment with well-detailed facts and concrete information, and didn't just rely on snarky repartee!
 
In case you have not noticed, American rating agencies outside of the US have become all but meaningless. Recent Examples: China, Brazil, Russia, Europe, now Japan. So this downgrade has no bearing at all on judging how successful or not Abenomics is.

The issue in Japan is still on structural reforms that are not forthcoming by the way.

No bearing at all. Gotcha.

Abenomics - unmitigated success. Check.
 
Never said it. But hardly anyone (other than of course you) makes a connection between an S&P downgrade and Abenomics per se. The downgrade has zero impact hence the market could not have cared less, meaning, even the fart of a mosquito would have moved dollar yen by more than the downgrade did. Why you blow it up to an elephant and attach the judgement of a whole economic policy set to it is completely beyond me and probably everyone else.

By the way the progress of Abenomics is in most professional circles regarded as relatively successful. It's structural change part is nowhere near where I wish it would be but your constant hate hammer is entirely misplaced. If you want a list of all the progress then let me know

No bearing at all. Gotcha.

Abenomics - unmitigated success. Check.
 
Never said it. But hardly anyone (other than of course you) makes a connection between an S&P downgrade and Abenomics per se. The downgrade has zero impact hence the market could not have cared less, meaning, even the fart of a mosquito would have moved dollar yen by more than the downgrade did. Why you blow it up to an elephant and attach the judgement of a whole economic policy set to it is completely beyond me and probably everyone else.

LOL! "Blow it up to an elephant". hahaa!

This was the ginormous post I made on the subject:

Unmitigated success.

Japan downgraded by S+P.

Wow! Look at all that fluff I've given to the event. Talk about overstating the importance! Holy shit, what drugs am I on?? Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! What was I thinking with all that text and attention whoring??


By the way the progress of Abenomics is in most professional circles regarded as relatively successful. It's structural change part is nowhere near where I wish it would be but your constant hate hammer is entirely misplaced. If you want a list of all the progress then let me know

List all the progress.

Incidentally, this is a thread about the gradual, yet consistent, decline of the Japanese economy. You, yourself are arguing that in the first pages. If you wish to now state how Japan is turning around, feel free to do so. I'll continue to post my thoughts on it, and not give 2 shits to your view otherwise.

Have a nice day!
 
Ouch the mosquito just bit us all in the arse. This little mosquito with a loud mouth and megaphone. I will post something shortly regarding Abenomics and I have to admit even I as ultra sceptic regarding structural reform progress was mildly impressed with issues I did not keep up to date with.

But even mentioning the S&P downgrade only shows that you are living as removed from actual markets as eskimos from dimsum. But I am glad your local newspaper covers a bit of financial news.

LOL! "Blow it up to an elephant". hahaa!

This was the ginormous post I made on the subject:



Wow! Look at all that fluff I've given to the event. Talk about overstating the importance! Holy shit, what drugs am I on?? Talk about making a mountain out of a molehill! What was I thinking with all that text and attention whoring??




List all the progress.

Incidentally, this is a thread about the gradual, yet consistent, decline of the Japanese economy. You, yourself are arguing that in the first pages. If you wish to now state how Japan is turning around, feel free to do so. I'll continue to post my thoughts on it, and not give 2 shits to your view otherwise.

Have a nice day!
 
Ouch the mosquito just bit us all in the arse. This little mosquito with a loud mouth and megaphone. I will post something shortly regarding Abenomics and I have to admit even I as ultra sceptic regarding structural reform progress was mildly impressed with issues I did not keep up to date with.

Whatever this means.

But even mentioning the S&P downgrade only shows that you are living as removed from actual markets as eskimos from dimsum. But I am glad your local newspaper covers a bit of financial news.

Mentioning it is simply mentioning news that was made. One line, one mention. Sorry it chapped your ass so much.

Look forward to your Nobel winning economics study on Japan.
 
Straight out of the FT:

The third arrow of Abenomics: a scorecard

Robin Harding and Leo Lewis in Tokyo

d689c8ab-6668-44c2-b63b-85d8e102d33d.img


It is sometimes called the “missing arrow” of Abenomics: on top of monetary and fiscal stimulus, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe came to power promising massive structural reforms, sufficient to raise Japan’s growth rate to an average of 2 per cent over the next 10 years.

Ten quarters after taking office, the economy is only 2.2 per cent bigger in real, seasonally adjusted terms, and the International Monetary Fund’s take is typical.

This summer, the fund called for Abenomics to be “reloaded”, saying that “further high-impact structural reforms are urgently needed to lift growth”.

However, many analysts in Tokyo give Mr Abe considerable credit, saying he has tackled some of Japan’s most entrenched interest groups.

Here is a scorecard of Mr Abe’s main “third arrow” reforms.

AGRICULTURE

f881ec76-5487-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

Agricultural co-operative reform is one of Mr Abe’s biggest successes to date, breaking the power of a formidable vested interest. “The political will required . . . was quite epoch-making,” says Robert Feldman, chief Japan economist at Morgan Stanley, given past political pandering to rural voters. The challenge now is to turn reform into agricultural productivity and pass the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal.

ENERGY

44c1f546-548c-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

Mr Abe is on track to meet his goal of a full liberalisation of Japan’s electricity market by 2016 and there are already hints it will lower some of the world’s highest consumer energy bills. After much agonising, Kyushu Electric brought its Sendai nuclear reactor back on line this August. The rest of Japan’s nuclear fleet remains idle, however, while analysts criticised this year’s new energy mix strategy as an unambitious compromise.

TAX REFORM

cfe5afac-54ad-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

Mr Abe cut Japan’s corporate tax rate from 34.62 per cent to 32.11 per cent this year and it will fall again to 31.33 per cent next year. His goal is to get the rate down into the 20s but for now Japan still has one of the highest corporate tax rates in the OECD, and there is little sign of the aggressive assault on depreciation and other allowances called for by analysts such as Andrew Smithers.

WOMENOMICS

0bc23998-54a7-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

Japanese female employment has reached a record high of 65 per cent and Mr Abe has been vocal on the issue, with a new gender equality law forcing companies with at least 300 employees to fix and publish targets for promoting women as managers. Kathy Matsui of Goldman Sachs described the legislation as “a giant step for Womenomics”. There is no compulsion, however, and getting women into part-time jobs is a lesser challenge than breaking down an oppressive glass ceiling.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

4aa7db9a-54a7-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

For many, Japan’s corporate governance and stewardship codes are the clearest third arrow success. Pushed through with unexpected speed and determination, they have changed the atmosphere for Japan Inc. Companies are straining to raise their return on equity and boardrooms are more receptive to external directors. But, says CLSA’s Japan strategist Nicholas Smith, “the key is turning up the pressure on CEOs of return-on-equity dwarfs that undershot the 5 per cent hurdle but have the assets for buybacks”.

SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONES

1ad4bcac-54a8-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

“The general direction on special economic zones is positive,” says Daiju Aoki, an economist at UBS, “but real developments with actual impact on the economy will take longer to emerge.” There are hints of success, such as larger buildings making their way through the Tokyo planning system. A bigger change, and an example of Mr Abe’s willingness to take on cultural taboos, will be the small local zones where families can sponsor visas for foreign maids for child and elderly care. Some 68 local authorities have had such plans approved by the PM’s office.

IMMIGRATION

59bee50a-54a8-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

Japan’s falling population means higher immigration is one of few plausible routes to faster growth. Take-up of existing schemes for skilled foreign workers remains very low, however, with the only progress in tiny niches such as IT workers and ski instructors. Haruko Arimura, Mr Abe’s administrative reform minister, recently described immigration as a “Pandora’s Box” and warned that “the world has been shaken by immigrants who come into contact with extremist thinking”.

LABOUR REFORM

f7914862-54ae-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.img

One crucial area where Mr Abe has shown little ambition, let alone results, is tackling the labour market gulf between permanent and temporary employees. The International Monetary Fund argues that this is crucial to raising productivity, but Mr Abe just abandoned one of the few planned labour reforms: a “white collar exemption” to working hours rules. “On labour law they’re really just not moving fast enough,” says Mr Feldman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nth
Here a list of all the bad

* Consumers are already squeezed (household savings as % of gdp are dropping for years already, Japan the nation of large household savings is a thing of the past). Consumers do not only pay more via increased sales tax but through more expensive imports as well

* The notion that a cheaper currency will revive exporters is anecdotal at best, because exporters have by 2014 diversified their production bases globally that the effect of a lower currency only benefits them by a fraction compared to years ago.

* Energy policies: Horrible at best: Expensive imports (God must truly have felt mercy by letting oil prices drop to 70 levels. Actually Japan pays the same price as at the beginning of the year when factoring in payments in US dollar for oil imports (still mostly the case). Japan will be unable to keep its nuclear reactors idle over time but problems and safety concerns at Tepco and Co are all but resolved.

* Aging society and lack of low skilled workers. Where is Abe's third arrow. Japan is in dire need for nurses, care takers, workers at the lower end of the rope but Japan is still in denial and hates the idea to let a larger number of Filipinas and Co immigrate. Of course Japan can do the same as Hong Kong and treat its foreign workers like 3rd class citizens and like-animals by granting those with white skins immigration and long-term residency rights but deny them to its South Asian foreign workers (I am not in support of this idea at all). Furthermore, where are the incentives for young couples to plan offspring? There are none. People are scared, people have no positive vision of the future. Japan Inc is getting squeezed by China and Japanese households in turn by Japan Inc. (how that works see below point). Further, the pension system is a joke and there is nobody who would touch this hot potato (I worked for more than a decade in Japan and not that I am dependant on some future pension but I wrote it off from the start anyway because the defined contribution scheme guarantees close to zero payout, future inflation adjusted).

* Japan's business elite (Japan Inc), I mean large corporations, are left to do whatever they want. There are no caps as to how many of its workforce are allowed to toil on part time or limited contracts. In fact any Japanese company is allowed to hire 100% of its workforce on part-time contracts. This is pure hypocrisy by politicians to allow such. One one side they want women to be "baby machines" (literal statement by an ousted politician), on the other hand they do nothing to secure future planning by young families. Result -> nobody in their right mind will bear children and take on such grand responsibilities if the bread winner in the family works on a part-time contract that can be revoked at any time with little to no health or pension benefits. Japan Inc taking care of its workers? This is not 1970 or 1980, things have drastically changed. If any industrialized economy in the world has completely missed out on globalizations and been unable to adapt then it is Japan. Female top managers at Japanese corporations? Are you kidding me? Impossible thought still today for most Japanese men. Sufficient child care places so that families can actually plan their careers and future with children in mind? Let's not kid ourselves. Additionally, Japan lacks a huge dose of innovative spirit, more investments in research and development. That is unfortunately not something I expect can be changed because it is ingrained in Japanese culture to follow rather than lead.

* Japanese have given up on a political discourse. Nobody cares nor gets involved. Nobody goes on the streets to voice their disagreement with the political elite that sleeps and lacks a complete understanding of what to do to change things. It was telling when Abe mentioned this week "I nor anyone know what to do, I invite anyone to come forward to provide ideas and suggestions". In my country or in the US such statement by the top politician would spell the end of your political career and an admission of total and utter failure. Not so in Japan. In Japan you just call a snap election whose purpose nobody understands.

=> The only way Japan can turn things around is another leader ala Koizumi. Someone who dares to put the finger into the wound and clean it out even if it is painful. Someone who is not afraid to rattle other party members, someone who can wake up the sleepy town of Kasumigaseki. I have lived in Japan for a decade, I am married to my Japanese spouse, I speak Japanese. I do believe I have a pretty firm understanding of what is going on in Japan. What Japan needs is a spirit to be more aggressive, to start taking risk again, to fight again (in the same way than the post-war generation). The problem today is that young people have zero vision of the future which is why everyone escapes into manga, porn, video games, AKB48, and other crap that numbs temporarily but does not solve problems.

I find the discussion here and elsewhere about whether QE works or not, whether a lower yen will benefit exporters and by how much, whether it will turn around terms of trade, whether citizens would pick up JGBs if being asked by the political leadership, I find all those issues secondary and actually unimportant. Short term, sure they make an impact. But China does not plan for the short-term, and so should Japan not. What Japan needs is STRUCTURAL REFORM, not some lectures by self-declared economists who argue whether Keynesian approaches work or not. You guys seem to have completely lost the understanding of what drives businesses, why people on the street either save and dig in or become more risk taking and plan families. What Japan DOES NOT NEED is more stimulus. What Japan DOES NOT NEED is artificial demand. So ALL THE ECONOMIC BULLSHIT means nothing and does not solve Japan's problem. What Japan needs is STRUCTURAL REFORMS, Japan has to do away with some (not all of course) of its cultural inheritance LIKE ALL OTHER INDUSTRIALIZED COUNTRIES, what Japan needs is to rid itself of the fear of the foreign and foreigners, Japan needs to embrace change, a concept that is entirely foreign to Japanese culture for most part. Only then women can imagine to work and bear children at the same time, only then couples feel confident that they will be able to feed their infants down the road, only then people will take risk and become more entrepreneurial, only then will companies develop and create products that the world needs and wants, only then will companies expand machinery and human resources, only then will employment improve, only then will tax receipts improve, only then will Japan be able to even start servicing its debt, only then will Japan eventually be able to start paying down debt. Forget about fiscal or monetary stimulus, forget about government inflated demand. It does not work without structural reforms. Why? Because you can see what continued structural reform and change has done to Germany and you can see what QE and an artificial injection of supply or demand has done to Spain/Portugal/Greece.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nth
Indeed many of my issues that I brought up are reflected by the assessment of the author of this scorecard. I do not agree with some of the claimed progress but from what I hear the FT score card pretty much reflects how most professinals in Finance outside of Japan judge the progress under Abe. At least most everyone agrees that the situation has been and is improving and not getting worse as you claim.

 
Back
Top