Why does the author of your article not mention that the very same statistic registered the highest ever reading of 7.2% in March 2014? Or the fact that, during the years immediately before the tax hike, the average increase in household spending stayed meaningfully positive for the first time since the 2006 bull mkt? Or neglect to mention that the latest 5.9% drop is in real terms which double-counts the effect of the VAT hike?
Ideological bias isn't really a good thing for someone who purports to be an economist. Would you like me to post what I think is a reasonably balanced write up?
Ideological bias isn't really a good thing for someone who purports to be an economist. Would you like me to post what I think is a reasonably balanced write up?



