January 6th commission

userque said:
Yes. Suspect Representatives, for example, can better formulate lies if they know, in advance, whether they were recorded, who they were recorded with, and what they were recorded doing.

Criminal investigations 101 really.
More...
Criminal investigations 101... you just got a F
Your saying the state can withhold evidence from the defense...ever heard of discovery
A judge would be the one to determine what evidence can be shared

I guess your knowledge of legal systems is Soviet style
 
Here, let me dumb it down for you:

The OP spoke to releasing ALL video.

Any defendants who were charged, where video was used as evidence, have access to THAT video relevant to THEIR case.

The OP spoke to releasing ALL video.

See how easy that was. All you have to do (maybe?) is think harder, and longer, before you speak.

Do you and your buddies ever get tired of showing us just how MAGAtarded you all really are?

Dumbed down some more:

If you are charged, you get access to the evidence used against YOU.
If you are not charge, you don't get access to evidence during the investigation--unless law enforcement decides to release it.
 
Bunch of whiney little snowflakes. Bitch about every little piece of bullshit they think they've discovered.

200w.gif
 
userque said:
Here, let me dumb it down for you:

The OP spoke to releasing ALL video.

Any defendants who were charged, where video was used as evidence, have access to THAT video relevant to THEIR case.

The OP spoke to releasing ALL video.

See how easy that was. All you have to do (maybe?) is think harder, and longer, before you speak.

Do you and your buddies ever get tired of showing us just how MAGAtarded you all really are?

Dumbed down some more:

If you are charged, you get access to the evidence used against YOU.
If you are not charge, you don't get access to evidence during the investigation--unless law enforcement decides to release it.
More...
You flunk again

A defendant has the right to evidence that the State may not have
The defense also has the obligation to share its evidence with the State

I will dumb it down for you...because phrases like that are so persuasive
Normally both sides will present evidence and then they sit with the judge to determine what is allowed....but all sides get to see what they want..
 
Mercor said:
You flunk again

A defendant has the right to evidence that the State may not have
The defense also has the obligation to share its evidence with the State

I will dumb it down for you...because phrases like that are so persuasive
Normally both sides will present evidence and then they sit with the judge to determine what is allowed....but all sides get to see what they want..
More...
The dumb posts just keep coming and coming.

200.gif
 
Mercor said:
Criminal investigations 101... you just got a F
Your saying the state can withhold evidence from the defense...ever heard of discovery
A judge would be the one to determine what evidence can be shared

I guess your knowledge of legal systems is Soviet style
More...

Tell me you know nothing about the law without telling me you know nothing about the law...
 
Rep. Jim Jordan - whom Republicans nominated to investigate the Capitol riot - now says he spoke to Trump on the day but won’t say what they talked about
https://www.yahoo.com/news/rep-jim-jordan-whom-republicans-112541735.html
  • GOP Rep. Jim Jordan said on Tuesday he had spoken to Donald Trump on January 6.
  • Jordan was barred from serving on the Jan. 6 committee over concerns he was involved in the events.
  • House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Jordan could be called as a witness by the Jan. 6 panel.
(More at above url)
 
National Police Assn. Rips Congress For Jan.6 Focus While ‘Ignoring’ 2020 Riots
https://trendingpolitics.com/nation...ss-for-jan-6-focus-while-ignoring-2020-riots/
The National Police Association lambasted Congress on Tuesday for focusing heavily on the breach of the U.S. Capitol Building on Jan. 6 will “ignoring” the chaos, rioting, destruction, and violence that took place throughout the country last year.


“There were at least 574 violent riots in 2020, and yet today’s Congressional hearings are focusing on only one riot, January 6th, 2021, and hearing testimony from only a few of the police officers involved,” association spokeswoman Betsy Brantner Smith told The Washington Times.


Smith, a retired police sergeant, noted that immediately following the death of George Floyd in Minnesota in late May 2020, “policing was attacked from all sides” though law enforcement agencies were dealing with “violent riots night, after night, after night.”



“Brave police officers attempted to defend stores, apartment buildings, churches, hotels, several of their own precincts and courthouses and even a Ronald McDonald House from looting, arson and vandalism,” she said, noting further that one officer was paralyzed while several more suffered “horrific” injuries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top