Quote from Martinghoul:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-...om-london-to-shanghai-bypass-white-house.html
It sure looks to me that Summers is a LOT more of a political insider than Yellen. Certainly, he's a LOT closer to Obama.
I would agree but even in the light of a London based hedge fund trader like yourself, the little meetings in the morning are about how to indicate dissent in the minutes and managerial help for Ben.
Just how that research director with the Atlanta Fed can influence the outside may have more to do with Bloomberg wanting her as more of a Uberdove than what Summers could be with the Hawkish stance in the last Fed minutes compared to the last few years worth of those.
I think these quotes summed the article up well, as well as reality:
<i>
âAlmost every political adviser you see in the White House organization chart has had some experience with Larry Summers,â said Vincent Reinhart, a former top adviser to Bernanke and Alan Greenspan and now the chief U.S. economist for Morgan Stanley. âThatâs not true for Janet Yellen.â
âBy identifying all the reasons he should go for Yellen it implicitly undercuts support for Summers,â said Sarah Binder, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington who studies the relationship between the Fed and Congress. âThe letter made a point by not making a point.â
The letter may do little to dissuade Obama, Binder said. âIt seems that sheâs not in the orbit of what the White House is looking for.â
</i>