Jacko Doo Doo

[ARogueTrader]

Honestly, if you have that capacity, if I had quoted "Dr. Drew" you will have to admit that you would have discounted that too.

Wait and see what comes out in the evidence and the trial, and what serious clinical psychologists, experts in the field of child molestation and pedophelia begin to say.

I wonder what Dr. Drew would say about someone who thinks dogs and plants are atheists?

Quote from axeman:

So funny watching ART pretend to be a psychologist
His pop-psychoanalysis is a joke.

He asserts that MJ fits the pattern of a child molester
but never bothers to provide any evidence of this.

This is merely his opinion.

On the other hand... I did catch an interview with Dr Drew:
http://www.kepplerassociates.com/speakers/pinskydrew.asp?2
Chief resident at Huntington Hospital in Pasadena.
Board-certified addictionologist.
Medical Director for the Department of Chemical Dependency Services
Chief of Service in the Department of Medicine at Las Encinas Hospital in Pasadena
Clinical Assistant Professor of Pediatrics at Los Angeles Children's Hospital
Has written extensively on a variety of topics related to addiction,
adolescent health, intimacy, and relationships.


Dr. Drew gave his professional analysis of MJ based on what
is known.

What was his analysis of MJ?

He basically said he was undecided because MJ did **NOT**
show patterns of a child molester. Child molestors do NOT
historically ADMIT to sleeping with little boys.


I'm sure ART will now attack Dr Drew as a TV joke of sorts,
regardless of how many years he has spent counseling
disturbed teens and people with addictions, and regardless
of all his qualifications.

Well...there is ONE experts opinion. Or you can believe ARTs
pop-bullshit Im sure his qualifications out shine Dr Drews. LMAO


Love how he asserts GG must be a molester *OR* had been
abused himself. Leaves no other options. Can you say "Either or Fallacy"?.

Can you say stupid fu**cking **MORON**? What an idiot.
I think im moving ART up to the top of my "stupidest poser idiot" list
Just another armchair psychologist wannabe



peace

axeman

 

[LongShot]

Quote from ARogueTrader:


I wonder what Dr. Drew would say about someone who thinks dogs and plants are atheists?

BWAHAHHAHAHAHA!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!! LMAO!!! WAAAAAAAAAAA....WAAA...WAAAAAAAA

 

[axeman]

"Honestly, if you have that capacity, if I had quoted "Dr. Drew" you will have to admit that you would have discounted that too."

Nonsense. Dr. Drew is an expert in the field and well respected.
Not some fringe kook Dr.
I only disregard obscure bullshit, like your definition of socialism
which you dug up at some silly website recently to support
your weak position in another thread.


"Wait and see what comes out in the evidence and the trial".

Yeah...this is what I will do. Innocent until proven guilty remember?
I won't jump to conclusions like you have based on your pop-psychology bullshit.

Notice you STILL haven't posted a single experts opinion
that MJ shows the patterns of a molester.
Just your baseless drivel.


"I wonder what Dr. Drew would say about someone who thinks dogs and plants are atheists?"

If Dr. Drew is aware of the definitions, beyond the layman terminology,
then he would have no choice but to rationally agree.
It amazes me you cant get this simple concept through
your thick head. A-theism, without-theism, is simply the LACK
of theism. So by definition a dog/plant have to be atheists since
they do in fact LACK theistic belief.
Its so simple. If you want to know if something is an atheist,
just ask the following question:

Does X lack theism? If yes... then they are an a-theist. By definition.

Does a dog lack theism? YES.
Does a plant lack theism? YES.
So simple...no wonder you dont get it.

I wonder what Dr Drew would think of someone who claims
to have the only correct direct channel and magical ability
to communicate with god.

How have those god voices in your head been lately ??
What a fricken psycho.

Why dont you use your magical powers and communicate
with god NOW. Ask him if MJ really did it on our behalf,
and then we can settle this once and for all! LMAO
What a freak.


peace

axeman

Quote from ARogueTrader:

Honestly, if you have that capacity, if I had quoted "Dr. Drew" you will have to admit that you would have discounted that too.

Wait and see what comes out in the evidence and the trial, and what serious clinical psychologists, experts in the field of child molestation and pedophelia begin to say.

I wonder what Dr. Drew would say about someone who thinks dogs and plants are atheists?

 

[aphexcoil]

Quote from axeman:

[B
Does a dog lack theism? YES.
Does a plant lack theism? YES.
So simple...no wonder you dont get it. [/B]

Does a dog not vote republican? Does that make him a democrat? An independent? An anarchist?

 

[axeman]

I think you meant:
If a dog does NOT vote republican, does that make him a democrat? an independent, an anarchist?


A dog is not capable of voting, and a dog is not even capable
of possessing republican beliefs. Therefore a dog is
necessarily a-republican, since a-republican literally means
"lacking republican beliefs".



peace

axeman

Quote from aphexcoil:

Does a dog not vote republican? Does that make him a democrat? An independent? An anarchist?

 

[ARogueTrader]

He is not an expert in the field of pedophelia nor sexual abuse, nor of incest survival, etc.

His expertise is in addiction, not in all other fields.

You can spin your definition of atheism all you want, but anyone who says dogs and plants are atheists and/practicioners of atheism is a kook.

Quote from axeman:

"Honestly, if you have that capacity, if I had quoted "Dr. Drew" you will have to admit that you would have discounted that too."

Nonsense. Dr. Drew is an expert in the field and well respected.
Not some fringe kook Dr.
I only disregard obscure bullshit, like your definition of socialism
which you dug up at some silly website recently to support
your weak position in another thread.


"Wait and see what comes out in the evidence and the trial".

Yeah...this is what I will do. Innocent until proven guilty remember?
I won't jump to conclusions like you have based on your pop-psychology bullshit.

Notice you STILL haven't posted a single experts opinion
that MJ shows the patterns of a molester.
Just your baseless drivel.


"I wonder what Dr. Drew would say about someone who thinks dogs and plants are atheists?"

If Dr. Drew is aware of the definitions, beyond the layman terminology,
then he would have no choice but to rationally agree.
It amazes me you cant get this simple concept through
your thick head. A-theism, without-theism, is simply the LACK
of theism. So by definition a dog/plant have to be atheists since
they do in fact LACK theistic belief.
Its so simple. If you want to know if something is an atheist,
just ask the following question:

Does X lack theism? If yes... then they are an a-theist. By definition.

Does a dog lack theism? YES.
Does a plant lack theism? YES.
So simple...no wonder you dont get it.

I wonder what Dr Drew would think of someone who claims
to have the only correct direct channel and magical ability
to communicate with god.

How have those god voices in your head been lately ??
What a fricken psycho.

Why dont you use your magical powers and communicate
with god NOW. Ask him if MJ really did it on our behalf,
and then we can settle this once and for all! LMAO
What a freak.


peace

axeman

 

[ARogueTrader]

The insanity of axeman trying to sum up his defense plants and dogs being atheists can be found as follows:

My frying pan did not hear the phone ring because it is deaf.

My bathtub did not taste the ocean salt on my feet because it is tasteless.

My washing machine did not tell me that I had colors mixed with whites because it is mute.

My car didn't see the truck coming because it is blind.

My police scanner didn't notice the natural gas leak because it is unable to smell.

 

[axeman]

If you knew anything about Dr Drew, you would know he
frequently deals with sexual abuse issues. If you had
listened to even one of his programs, this comes up so frequently
it will depress you.
He is an expert in addictions/compulsive behaviors, and in dealing
with people who have been sexually abused, which far
outweighs your silly baseless opinions.

As for the definition of atheism. It is quite clear, and you continue
to dodge this fact.

You consistently refuse to answer the simple question:

Does a dog LACK a belief in god/gods?

The reason is clear. Because the answer is obvious.
If you answer YES to this, then you have just defined
precisely what atheism is.

Sorry you have a learning disability.


Notice... still ZIPPO evidence that MJ is following molester patterns.

This may in FACT be the case, but im just pointing out that
so far, your posts are total unsupported BULLSHIT, and that
is the problem I have with your pop-psychology bullshit.

Put up... or shut up already.

peace

axeman

Quote from ARogueTrader:

He is not an expert in the field of pedophelia nor sexual abuse, nor of incest survival, etc.

His expertise is in addiction, not in all other fields.

You can spin your definition of atheism all you want, but anyone who says dogs and plants are atheists and/practicioners of atheism is a kook.

 

[ARogueTrader]

He deals with sexual abuse issues, but lacks the clinical expertise. No where in any of your bio on him did it mention clinical expertise in that field. If you can post otherwise, please do.

Just because an MD deals with the mental state of his patients who have physical aliments, that doesn't make him a qualified psychologist. He would call in an expert if there were a problem.

Dr. Drew has a general understanding but little clinical work in that field is my guess (oh, unless his stint on MTV qualifies as clinical work in the eyes of the medical boards).

I wait with baited breath for your story of hearing Dr. Phil on Oprah as the basis of your conclusions on Jacko.

Quote from axeman:

If you knew anything about Dr Drew, you would know he
frequently deals with sexual abuse issues. If you had
listened to even one of his programs, this comes up so frequently
it will depress you.
He is an expert in addictions/compulsive behaviors, and in dealing
with people who have been sexually abused, which far
outweighs your silly baseless opinions.

As for the definition of atheism. It is quite clear, and you continue
to dodge this fact.

You consistently refuse to answer the simple question:

Does a dog LACK a belief in god/gods?

The reason is clear. Because the answer is obvious.
If you answer YES to this, then you have just defined
precisely what atheism is.

Sorry you have a learning disability.


Notice... still ZIPPO evidence that MJ is following molester patterns.

This may in FACT be the case, but im just pointing out that
so far, your posts are total unsupported BULLSHIT, and that
is the problem I have with your pop-psychology bullshit.

Put up... or shut up already.

peace

axeman

 

[axeman]

Of course... the OMNISCIENT ART **KNOWS*** exactly
what Dr Drews specific experience is in all fields.
You assert he has NO clinical experience.

PROVE IT! Im calling you on it.

"If you can post otherwise, please do."

Ah ah ahhh..... you cant shift the burden of proof. So sorry.
YOU asserted he does NOT have clinical experience.

You can retract that statement, or go do YOUR homework
and prove YOUR assertion. Im not required to prove YOUR
assertion.



What a fricken whacko you are.

All you can do is split hairs now. The man knows his shit,
and obviously FAR better than you do.
You have ZERO qualifications. Even if Dr Drew lacked
specific clinical experience... he is STILL WAY AHEAD of your
knowledge on the subject.

Any rational person would choose his expert opinion
of your idiotic pop-psychology crap. No brainer.
Thats the point. You have given us NADA to date.


peace

axeman

Quote from ARogueTrader:

He deals with sexual abuse issues, but lacks the clinical expertise. No where in any of your bio on him did it mention clinical expertise in that field. If you can post otherwise, please do.

Just because an MD deals with the mental state of his patients who have physical aliments, that doesn't make him a qualified psychologist. He would call in an expert if there were a problem.

Dr. Drew has a general understanding but little clinical work in that field is my guess (oh, unless his stint on MTV qualifies as clinical work in the eyes of the medical boards).

I wait with baited breath for your story of hearing Dr. Phil on Oprah as the basis of your conclusions on Jacko.