Jack Hershey

Quote from jack hershey:


In both cases I plan on giving the algorithms away as I have done with the last nearly 30 royalties and copywrite for all the books I have written. Put that on the list too.

Just out of curiosity, what books have you written? A quick search of your name on Amazon and on the Library of Congress database doesnt turn up anything.

-bbc
 
What other online forums or websites can you find Jack's posts?

Who knows maybe if I read enough posts I'll be able to understand what's going on.
 
Quote from jack hershey:



This will help you out a little.

The last . . . . .
me under those conditions you can bet you are going to get it right there too.


NEVER FAILS !!!!!!!!!!! ANOTHER POST WRITTEN BY JACK THAT MAKES NO SENSE !! THIS GUY IS AN IRAQI SPY !!
 
Quote from okwon:

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=221519#post221519
This guy seems to understand and be very familiar with Jack's work. I have equally challenging time understanding his posts too. Seems to be written in a similar manner as Jack's. What is it about these posts that I am having such a hard time understanding when other people seem to be doing just fine??
she is Jack sidekick/ assistant, she did a pretty good jack-speak, in my opinion. She can't help it, there is only one way to be a duck as you know.

Quote from okwon:
What other online forums or websites can you find Jack's posts?
Who knows maybe if I read enough posts I'll be able to understand what's going on.

you don't want to know, trust me :D
 
Since so many people have expressed having a hard time understanding Jack Hershey's posts, I've run his last message through a special "logical de-noiser" algorithm I invented, and below his original quoted post is the new and improved extra-sensical version.


Quote from jack hershey:



This will help you out a little.

The last poll taken was on MIF and it showed 4 out of 5 poeple dissagree with my ways and what I am and what I represent.

In 1960, a similar measure was taken by a group of volumteers in Poughkeepsie, NY. 1 out of five people after about three years, it was determined, felt that what I did and how it worked was sensible and worthwhile.

Some time passed. For both cases the same result attained. the first millionaire came from the 1960 group. More recently, it is easier to make that kind of money. Start up users, are able it turns out to make 11.1% with an average hold of 6.6 days. Re: commodities, I use an example of a person's first 20 hours of trading on 10 separate occasions over 8 weeks; the account showed a value of 160% of the initial value for a 60% gain. The person had losses and, on occassion, I shut him down because he was behind the beat on a play.

I draw this conclusion: 4 out of 5 people do not like what I do, how I operate and the type a person I am. Make that a given here. My test of efficacy is transference. If you know how to google; gin up 30 posts in ragingbull for a day where a bunch of people exited a stock at 22, reentered at 11 and closed at 16. I did the posts 5 to 15 min ahead of time so they could play it as a courtesy. I had seen the stock starting on the prior day for the first time.

The first time I turned in a paper (his #1 domestic priority) for President Carter for the 5 o'clock helicopter it was 7 pages long and three hours before 5:00 pm. I was told to redo it before 5 to make it a 1 pager. I declined and requested to be relieved of duty if that was appropriate at the 11:00. The President worked on it for 7 hours and I received the legal note pad temporarily, to forward the next steps.

Nobody likes how I write except a few. Add that annecdote to your list.

You can find numerous people who have lost money using my methods. Those people for the most part were adults.

I respond to people who ask. I occassionally find someone who is a tough strong person who can take my chidding and admonitions so I work the turf accordingly. On the otherhand I show patience occassionally.

I do not respond in kind to anyone who is critical of me in an unfounded way. They are challenged bt their baggage.

I have the equtiesstuff in software in C language and it performed at the 11.1% for and av 6.6 day hold. just recently I dug up the logic sheets for the expert level of futures indexes. I bought airline tickets through August to transfer the stuff to a programmer in SF. Because i could not meet his requirement that i dig them out by x date so he could use time available he declined to turn them into software. So right now I am deciding to do them over one more time instead of spending too much time on here.

In both cases I plan on giving the algorithms away as I have done with the last nearly 30 royalties and copywrite for all the books I have written. Put that on the list too.

I am not being smug or anything else. The facts speak for themselves. What I do is transferable and people enjoy the wealth they have. I almost scanned a Singapore subway ticket as a humourous comment.

When zbear asked about the market a couple of days ago, I actually thought he wanted to know. How could I know he didn't give a crap when he asked for some information.

Someone said here that they has been reading my BS for four years. that alone is a terrific record for a bullshitter. I hope he also sees how consistant I am.

The thread on stochastics I didn't start. I just made some comments and a guy told be to cut the crap and buzz off. Someone else started the thread and suggested that I post there to get the topic out of an important one on trading price only.

The stock market and commodities has been very good to me. because one day for one hour in an office a person gave me some clues as to what it was all about in 1957, I started returning the favor in 1960. People change. A lot of people here represent less than they are capable of. and for sure they are going to continue to try to nail me. Go for it. I'm 70 as you know

I'm a CERT instructor designate in Tucson; if you meet me under those conditions you can bet you are going to get it right there too.


This will help him outside a little. The taken last survey was in MIF and demonstrated 4 outside dissagree of 5 poeple with my ways and which I am and what I represent. In 1960, a similar measurement was taken by a group from volumteers in Poughkeepsie, NY. 1 outside five people after near three years, was determined, felt that what I did and how it worked he was sensible and of merit. A certain hour happened. For both cases that the same result obtained first millionaire it came from the 1960 groups. More recently, it is easier to make that class of the money. He begins for above to users, can turns out to do 11.1% with an average grasping of 6.6 days. Re: the matters, I use an example of the first 20 hours of a person to negotiate in 10 separated occasions on 8 weeks; the account demonstrated a value of 160% of the initial value for an increase of 60%. The person had losses and, in occassion, I closed drink because he was behind the blow in a game. Drawing this conclusion: 4 outside 5 people do not have taste of which I do, how I work and is the type a person. Make that dice here. My test of the effectiveness is transference. If you know google; catch upon 30 posts in ragingbull by a day where a people handful left an action in 22, entered 11 and closed again in 16. I made posts 5 to 15 minutes in front of the time so they could play it like courtesy. It had seen the action beginning in the previous day for the first time. The first time which I gave return in a paper (its domestic priority # 1) for president Carretero for the 5 hour of the helicopter was 7 long pages and three hours before 5:00 P.M.. They said me to make it before 5 to do a 1 paginador again to him. I declined and I solicitd to be stood out of having if that were appropriate in the 11:00. The president worked in him by 7 hours and I temporarily received the legal cushion of the note, to send the steps following. Nobody tastes how I write except some. Annecdote to its list adds that. You can find numerous people that there is lost the money using my methods. That people for most were adult. I respond to the people who request. Occassionally encounter to which she is a hard resistant person who can take my chidding and the warnings so work the turf therefore. In otherhand I demonstrate to patience occassionally. I do not respond in class to any person who is critical of me of a infundada way. They are bt defied its baggage. I have equtiesstuff in software in language of C and grasping of 6.6 days was made hardly in 11.1% for and American system of pesos that I dug recently upon the leaves of the logic for the expert level of the indices of the futures. I bought tickets of air line with August to transfer the matter to a programmer in SF. Because it could not solve its requirement that I dig them towards outside by the date of x so he could use the time available he declined to give them returned in software. So now I am deciding to do them on a plus time instead of the cost too much hour ignited here. In plan of both cases I in giving to the algorithms far since I have done with last almost the 30 rights and copywrite for all books I they have written. Position that in the list also. I am not being with satisfied air or any thing. The facts speak for themselves. What I do it I am tranferible and people enjoy the abundance that she has. I almost explored a ticket of the subterranean of Singapur like commentary humourous. When he has been to zbear requested about the market a pair for of days, I he really thought wished to know. How he could know it did not give crap when he requested a certain information. Somebody said here that there are been reading my BS by four years that is only a fabulous file to bullshitter. I also wait for it I see how he is consistant I am. The thread of spiral in stochastics that I did not begin. I finish commening out some and an individual this to have to cut crap and to hum dull. Some other began the spiral thread and suggested qu
 
Quote from hakeemjoe:

Since so many people have expressed having a hard time understanding Jack Hershey's posts, I've run his last message through a special "logical de-noiser" algorithm I invented, and below his original quoted post is the new and improved extra-sensical version.


Hey, great idea... you know what I immediately thought of?
How about running Jack's posts through some web foreign language translator that would translate them from English (I suppose) into, say, French and then back. I bet they would be much more meaningful then. Anybody wants to try it for fun?
Post the results here.
 
You guys have been suckered again. The poster you know as "jack hersey" actually is a marketing rep for the Bayer company. They cleverly infiltrate hundreds of web forums with tantalizing yet indecipherable gibberish that has been designed by North Korean psychologists to produce intense headaches.
 
Back
Top