He does not have any information that he could use to compare the two.
Jack Hershey Method Since 2008
- Thread starter bwolinsky
- Start date
He does not have any information that he could use to compare the two.
The opening post states an erroneous factor in the use of the Cash Cow. The Cash Cow operates form leading indicators of price on an intraday trading fractal.
Others have pointed out that the data and results are screwed up.
The theory foundation of the Cash Cow is how to trade a two line indicator.
The indicators were formed using the six cases of the two line indicator.
An example of a misuse of this indicator system is the SPM. The author of SPM did not use any of the six cases to determine his signal for SPM. He could not accept any input on how to make SPM perform on an effective or efficient level. So SPM disappeared from the landscape.
These results are a consequence of establishing a complete system on a trading fractal.
By collecting enough data points, the p drops to less than 0.05. 20 data points is where that happens.
The conservative statistician will take the time to chose the worst possible cases to get the least favorable performance.
as the daily data points become available, the statisitcal quality of the person doing the stats will also become evident.
The indicator for this approach is known. The fractal being used is known.
Those who are viewing the record are noticing that this base line is crude and just out of the box vis a vis the CW perfomance maximums.
how ever the stats are done on the data being provided, there is an opportunity to normalize the stats. Normalization then lets a standard performance to the market's offer be constructed. this will be very tricky business for any statistician since most do not know how to handle raw data and first convert the raw data to high utility data.
Two major major considerations are available. Neither is used by anyone. By incorporating these two major major considerations a person gets to see just how lousy the data points are currently. Moreso, the person gets to see how and why the CW range of systems do not come anywhere close to making the market's offer.
The status now is that the data presented exceeds any CW operation. Secondly, it can now be chacked out why CW is so poor in effectiveness and efficiency and performance. what can be used from this point forward is the baseline of CW responses to this data set to show the lack of performance considerations by these CW types.
The opening post was a good example. The poster showed the last trade of his mistaken system was compared to "days" when what is going on is an intraday trading system.
Some of the most recent posted charts, do not show volume or its stand in on the charts. these people, mentally, have the CW standard failings s outlined in Behavior Finance's basic proinciples posted on the home page of Behavioral Finance (not a site on the Wikipedia level).
The growth of all markets is quantified and qualified. The statisitically processed results are available, roughly speaking, on every street corner. These data explain what standing still in wealth is all about.
finally, process this post I have responded to.
Here may be a person looking at a fifteen minute chart saying something about trades. He says there are X amount of trades (one at some point on every bar) and a resulting return. The return is in his "little" category. He also does a risk classification of "low risk to some extent". In summary, this person is doing 27 trades a day, net profitable and enduring risk.
Lets look at his system: bars are colored (the sentiment) and they have opens and closes. One bar's close is the next bars open. He trades every bar. Conclusion: he trades every bar at the time of color change or, if not, on bar close. This could be what a non CW trader is up against for standard setting.
In public forums, this poster is a loser, currently. Lets see if he can get to BE.
Others may not think as you not think.
If you have had geometry, did you ever do a proof, where you did not know how it was going to turn out?
Try doing the proof for the pattern.
If you ever get through it, post it. It will be helpful to many.
Focus on the briefest profit takings I post.
do their deductive proofs.
Start with small things and get your mind to begin to be open to growing up.
More forward from your witless state.
Your job is to sit on the sidelines and find out through the grapevine how others got to watch me trade in this day and age.
People have watched me for about 54 plus years.
You are not considering the definition of insanity with any degree of promise. You expect it to turn out differently this time.
You are on the wrong side of the definition.
redduke
We did meet yesterday for R and R and to see the beginning of the night blooming ciris (a wild or domesticated cactus) annual blooming.
we didn't schedule for next week except after thursday I am out of action. Our cameraman is still out of it.
I use dragon all the time so I can just plug into what ever screen is being shot and that computer can be hooked to you.
To keep it simple, I will try for the open Tuesday and use the host's computer. I'll get him to have paltalk rolling. Since he is in the middle of ALS, he will not be talking, he uses a Hawkings type machine. He is the keeper of the PVT Universe, so that may come up during dull moments. His techie will have Paltalk rolling.
It is impotant to have the "Pattern" down cold since everyone I trade with is very competent.
We do the calls 5, 10 or 15 minutes ahead of time. What this means is it will be days past in ET where there was chat in a chat room and people typed things ahead of time to explain what event was coming up. In Paltalk it is a voice that is heard and I narrate ahead of the market and just, on turns explain how the carve goes. I can only speak at 1/4 of the rate of all happenings. This means I choose to say a stream of thought in a high ranking theme and stear to each most important theme s the themes change.
It may be that Paltalk enables anyone in the group to speak. No one like brass can be in Paltalk it would be too destructive. You have suggested that I narrate. I understand this to mean others will listen. Since you determine who is who, please refrain from having any airheads and detractors (they are not mentally oriented to input anyway).
I am all prepped and handled logistically.
Do you want me to post the first Tuesday trades (an hour or so) Monday after close? This makes it easier for people to prepare to follow.
I will NOT have any indicators in the mix. Only my office has concurrent screens running on different systems.
As far as Q and A, there is no way possible to have any quality assurance.
One thing you can do is make sure all the downside that happens gets posted later somewhere some how. I really need to keep people away from me who are suseptible to myths and CW beliefs. Detractors are the majority in the financial industry; the less I have to deal with the better.. As baro san pointed out, it is not a good idea for me to spend time on or with such.
We did meet yesterday for R and R and to see the beginning of the night blooming ciris (a wild or domesticated cactus) annual blooming.
we didn't schedule for next week except after thursday I am out of action. Our cameraman is still out of it.
I use dragon all the time so I can just plug into what ever screen is being shot and that computer can be hooked to you.
To keep it simple, I will try for the open Tuesday and use the host's computer. I'll get him to have paltalk rolling. Since he is in the middle of ALS, he will not be talking, he uses a Hawkings type machine. He is the keeper of the PVT Universe, so that may come up during dull moments. His techie will have Paltalk rolling.
It is impotant to have the "Pattern" down cold since everyone I trade with is very competent.
We do the calls 5, 10 or 15 minutes ahead of time. What this means is it will be days past in ET where there was chat in a chat room and people typed things ahead of time to explain what event was coming up. In Paltalk it is a voice that is heard and I narrate ahead of the market and just, on turns explain how the carve goes. I can only speak at 1/4 of the rate of all happenings. This means I choose to say a stream of thought in a high ranking theme and stear to each most important theme s the themes change.
It may be that Paltalk enables anyone in the group to speak. No one like brass can be in Paltalk it would be too destructive. You have suggested that I narrate. I understand this to mean others will listen. Since you determine who is who, please refrain from having any airheads and detractors (they are not mentally oriented to input anyway).
I am all prepped and handled logistically.
Do you want me to post the first Tuesday trades (an hour or so) Monday after close? This makes it easier for people to prepare to follow.
I will NOT have any indicators in the mix. Only my office has concurrent screens running on different systems.
As far as Q and A, there is no way possible to have any quality assurance.
One thing you can do is make sure all the downside that happens gets posted later somewhere some how. I really need to keep people away from me who are suseptible to myths and CW beliefs. Detractors are the majority in the financial industry; the less I have to deal with the better.. As baro san pointed out, it is not a good idea for me to spend time on or with such.
I do dearly love you, but you are so fucking full of shit. No Paltalk. No commentaries. No videos. No ambiguation. Post real fucking time calls here. How fucking hard is it? "Short ES U2 9:30:12 EST 1325.5." Othewise you have not a hair on your grey pimply saggy old ass!
As I said previously in a post: short on the opening bar Monday the 25th.
FYI to do this, you use a market order.
The market then tells you the partial fills that added up to the market order and how they were distributed over the 10 accounts.
Redduke will mot make you part of Paltalk. If it goes on a video it will be the narration of someone's screen who recorded the video and the Paltalk in parallel.
You are one of those people who still doesn't know that calls were made in PVT and SCT for over a year each. The SCT stuff was a written record and it is archived as well.
Posting on ET during the day is mostly done by chicken feed traders. You are a chicken feed trader as is well known.
I do not connect any of my trading computers to anything close to ET.
If you recall, the 100,000 share trade I did that made a 17 point average net; it was judged by a third party using a FEDEX directly from the brokers with a highlighted 31 page verification of the partial fills. The third party was seleceted by another person and I was, roughly speaked, obligated to have the fedex sent to someone I never heard of directly from the broker who did the trades. the third party did the checkout at someone else's request and the FEDEX contents saved him a lot of searching since he had the times, etc to look for on his computer.
Read some books (like Gary Smith) to find out what it takes in real time to trade multiple retail accounts that out do most pro trading.
All these things you keep claiming need to happenjhave happened and the record is there for anyone to see if they do their work.
If you want, read Gary and my conversations any time you feel like it.
Short the open? That looks like a fair call tonight, as 6E is weakly down. We'll see after the continental open.
You are always appealing to unverifiable aged out evidence. Make a few calls RT after the open. As I said before, you don't have to do it personally. Have one of your hangerson sickophants do it. Me a chicken feed trader? Cluck, cluck! But YOU are chickenSHIT.
You piss me off so bad I may just show you my NQ calls in the morning. Harder for me to do than you because my trades often last less than a minute. Whereas you allegedly hold for a few 5 minute bars. Slow mo? More like no show.