Quote from R. Raskolnikov:
I suggest you bet against the "more likely" scenarios you've conjured up in your head.
Meh ... in that case, I'll tell you the same thing that I tell every Hershey trader.Quote from bwolinsky:
The backtest suggests it was coded correctly.
Quote from bwolinsky:
But where's Jack? We finally have his program? Where's the old son of a gun so I can give him a pat on the back?
I'm betting the MACDex was authored by SpyderTrader.
Quote from frostengine:
Granted I didn't put much time into researching this. But it appears that MACDex is simply the MACD. I do not use Wealth Lab so i can only go by what i'm reading..but apparently the classic MACD in WL is set to using 26 EMA and 12 EMA... The MACDex indicator lets you specify which 2 EMAs to use..
Which is nothing special if thats the case.
Quote from MandelbrotSet:
Meh ... in that case, I'll tell you the same thing that I tell every Hershey trader.
Put your money where your mouth is.
P.S. I think you're a journeyman coder at best bwolinsky, not the master level programmer you present yourself to be. Too many mistakes (and the glaring error of interpolating the SPX with the ES).
Quote from MandelbrotSet:
LMAO, frostengine is taking you to school.![]()
![]()
Quote from Trader666:
You're a naive moron if, as you said, you actually believe that debunking Hershey takes money out of your pocket.