Well, it's really an SMA testing whether the close is bigger than the open.Quote from Trader666:
You'll get this:
http://wl4.wealth-lab.com/cgi-bin/WealthLab.DLL/getdoc?id=119
Well, it's really an SMA testing whether the close is bigger than the open.Quote from Trader666:
You'll get this:
http://wl4.wealth-lab.com/cgi-bin/WealthLab.DLL/getdoc?id=119
Quote from Trader666:
No slippage?
Is that because you entered/exited on the close of the bar that gave the signal like ScottD did?
If so, could you post results for entering/exiting next bar on the open, with and without slippage?
Quote from Trader666:
So is entering and exiting on the close of the bar that gave you the signal which was calculated using the closing price.
Quote from bwolinsky:
Sorry, T, I didn't read this right, that's correct. You won't have the value UNTIL the bar closes. The way they are interpreting is actually peeking, and they'll have to revise their script to make it work. They calculated the value on the current bar, and bought on the current bar on close; the way it's realistically possible is to wait for the close <i>and then</i> buy on the next bar's open. That's the correct way of doing it, as you said.
Quote from MandelbrotSet:
Good work bwolinsky, you called Jack Hershey on his game on his own terms, beat the stuffing out of the fourth or fifth attemp to code his pseudo-auto trading system, and showed everyone here what a real auto trading system looks like.
I love how everytime Jack Hershey makes a move he steps-in-shit.![]()
Neoxx is a laughing stock and his boot camp is a bust.
ScottD and the other so-called auto trading system developers have been made to look like fools.
Ah, there is still a place for sanity around here.![]()
Quote from Trader666:
And I pointed this out on the tread twice, here, but it was ignored.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2218328#post2218328
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2218944#post2218944